Replies

I think Lakin would already have standing to sue, simply because this court-martial was convened under the authority of Obama. If they find him guilty he would definitely have standing to sue for the illegal actions of someone besides Joe Biden acting as CINC. He would have particular justiciable harm so there would be no way they could deny him standing.

I think they are hoping Lakin would sue to have a court-martial conviction overturned - which would get Lakin out of trouble but wouldn’t get him discovery or address the issue at stake. But I think Lakin would use his conviction as the basis to have standing in federal court - to show that he suffered particular, justiciable harm resulting from somebody besides Joe Biden (the only person the Constitution allows to “act as President” since Jan 20, 2009) acting as CINC.

The only way they can skirt this issue forever is if the judiciary lets them, and that is why I am very concerned that the judiciary may have been threatened. I’ve seen such bizarre behavior from so many of the judges, it just doesn’t make sense unless they’ve been taken hostage.

Some of them - like Judge Robertson - I could believe the behavior from, because he’s one of the Magnificent Seven put in place by Clinton to protect his buddies from justice. Somebody of that low quality might well have claimed that the case had already been decided on Twitter, even without having to be threatened into making such a ridiculous judgment - just because he’s a moron.

But to get people like Judge Carter, who seemed to be in earnest, all of a sudden hiring a law clerk from the company defending Obama while the case with Obama was in process with Carter.... that is just plain nuts. That gives such an appearance of corruption that no judge would do that unless they WANTED the case to appear corrupted.

And to have somebody like Clarence Thomas come right out and say that SCOTUS was evading the issue of whether a president has to be born in America, and after a bit of discomfort smile as if it had been a joke all along - to have somebody as serious about justice and the Constitution as Thomas act like that is just bizarre.

And SCOTUS meeting with Obama in private when a case regarding him was pending. Botching up the oath so that the legally binding one was not witnessed by anybody. Justice Stevens calling Joe Biden “Mr President” after swearing him in.

It’s bizarre stuff. I’m afraid they’ve been threatened - not necessarily personally but threatened that Soros and the Islamists will do something like the initial run on the bank in Sept of 2008 which would create a panic and destroy the entire world economy. GW Bush was talking as if the world would end if they didn’t pass TARP. Somebody scared the heck out of him, and if they could scare him that way I don’t doubt that they could also scare SCOTUS. If Soros joined with the Islamists he would have the kind of money and control to do to the world what he has done with individual countries. And it seems very possible that he has united with the Islamists, given that he said he’s afraid America would win the war on terror, which would keep America and capitalism strong - the 2 forces Soros believes are evil incarnate.

What’s ironic is what I was thinking back when a judge in the Dearborn, MI area ruled that the phone monitoring done under Bush was unconstitutional. I realized how vulnerable we are, because one judge could be told by Islamists in a heavily-Muslim area like Dearborn that they or their family would be killed if they didn’t rule a certain way, or if they told anybody that they had been threatened. One judge taken hostage in such a way in a vulnerable part of the country could inflict much legal damage on the country.

And I thought at the time that one of the only ways we could protect ourselves would be to bug the judge’s phone so we could know and prove that a legal decision was made under duress - and could find and capture those responsible. Which made that particular ruling especially critical, since it would destroy our only line of defense against such a thing.

The Muslims know to use our legal system against us. That was in their playbook that was recovered; darn, can’t remember the name of that. But it said that if they were captured they should immediately use America’s legal system as a weapon against America. So we know they are smart and they recognize that our legal system is a huge, huge vulnerability for us.

Everything Obama has done has been to the benefit of the Islamists and to the destruction of the US, Israel, capitalism, and the US Constitution. The motive, the modus operandi, the connections, the results.... it all makes sense when you insert the idea of Soros and the Islamists working together to take our legal system hostage. When you realize that Obama’s lawyers threatened the media heads in just such a way - once before the election and once afterwards - this scenario doesn’t seem as kooky as it might seem at first.