Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sola Veritas
Although, I think the “embarassment” spoke of was that a mere LTC in the Army could force the Chief Executive to be transparent and produce documents.

The judge sounds like a defense attorney for Obama. If the judge meant there was actually something in the record, how does the judge know opening evidence could be an embarrassment for the president? Does the judge know what is in them ? If so, how did the judge know ? Has the judge been having communications with the administration ? Isn't that a bit unethical ?

105 posted on 09/02/2010 8:43:49 PM PDT by TheCipher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: TheCipher

All the judges in these cases have engaged in unethical behavior and have given really, really bad arguments as well.

I actually wonder if they are purposely putting up red flags to tell the world they are making these decisions under duress.


117 posted on 09/02/2010 9:13:30 PM PDT by butterdezillion (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson