Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stephen Hawking: God was not needed to create the Universe
Daily Telegraph ^ | 02 Sep 2010 | Laura Roberts

Posted on 09/02/2010 6:21:27 AM PDT by tlb

The Big Bang was the result of the inevitable laws of physics and did not need God to spark the creation of the Universe, Stephen Hawking has concluded.

In his latest book, The Grand Design, an extract of which is published in Eureka magazine in The Times, Hawking said: “Because there is a law such as gravity, the Universe can and will create itself from nothing. Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the Universe exists, why we exist.”

“It is not necessary to invoke God to light the blue touch paper and set the Universe going.”

In June this year Prof Hawking told a Channel 4 series that he didn't believe that a "personal" God existed. He told Genius of Britain: "The question is: is the way the universe began chosen by God for reasons we can't understand, or was it determined by a law of science? I believe the second. If you like, you can call the laws of science 'God', but it wouldn't be a personal God that you could meet, and ask questions."

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: atheismandstate; atheist; atheistsupremacist; bigbang; book; god; hawking; stephenhawking; thenogodgod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-224 last
To: tlb
I understand exactly what he's saying.

The problem is, as always with secularists, he is missing the ability to abstract to a logical conclusion.

Very sad. Especially coming from the best popular human argument against euthanasia and abortion currently alive.


Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

221 posted on 09/06/2010 4:49:20 PM PDT by The Comedian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

additional: archival:
222 posted on 09/06/2010 7:27:14 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Democratic Underground... matters are worse, as their latest fund drive has come up short...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: Diamond
But thus far you have demonstrated that you are not interested in discussing whether or science can illuminate the issue of whether or not the universe had a beginning, and if so whether or not the beginning was caused.

Science is always a work in progress and doesn't claim to have the ultimate answers. You do claim to have the ultimate answer to these scientific questions, based on a book written by people who thought the Earth is flat.

223 posted on 09/07/2010 7:37:25 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: momtothree

Yup...to be so smart, he lacks common sense.

It’s like sayig “we really don’t need to pay so much attention, or ANY attention actually to oxygen” when discussing gas exchange or perfusion.


224 posted on 09/17/2010 6:24:07 PM PDT by tpanther (Science was, is and will forever be a small subset of God's creation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-224 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson