Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/31/2010 6:30:09 AM PDT by RogerFGay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: RogerFGay
What other national leader and political party in world history was obsessed with race and concentrating power? Think!
2 posted on 08/31/2010 6:31:40 AM PDT by RogerFGay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RogerFGay

That’s because Obummer is only HALF black. That’s like getting a generic Visa card, not a Gold or Platinum card, with the credit line already maxed out. LOL. IOW, it ain’t working. LOL


5 posted on 08/31/2010 6:37:41 AM PDT by rickb308 (Muslims need to check with Native Americans & ask how that whole cowboys & indians thing worked out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RogerFGay

Truth be told, the Left is populated with Racists.


7 posted on 08/31/2010 6:41:52 AM PDT by Howie66 (I can see November from my house.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RogerFGay

Libs use the issue of race to marginalize and divide people. Isn’t this the essence of racism?


8 posted on 08/31/2010 6:42:15 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RogerFGay

Rangel Hits Back at Obama
Rep. Charles Rangel has fired back at President Obama for saying the embattled New York City Democrat should “end his career with dignity,” declaring: “Frankly, he has not been around long enough to determine what my dignity is.”
Speaking at a candidates’ forum in Harlem on Monday night, the 20-term Democrat also said: “For the next two years, I will be more likely to protect his dignity.”
On July 29, a House ethics panel leveled 13 charges against Rangel, including hoarding below-market apartments and improper fundraising.
Obama said in an interview the next day: “He’s somebody who’s at the end of his career. I’m sure that what he wants is to be able to end his career with dignity. And my hope is that it happens.”
But on Aug. 10, a defiant Rangel said on the House floor: “I am not going away. I am here . . .
“If I can’t get my dignity back here, then fire your best shot in getting rid of me through expulsion.”
And at the candidates’ forum on Monday, he told the crowd: “If it’s OK with my doctor, I am going to serve the next two years.”
Then in an interview after the forum, Rangel again referred to Obama’s comment, saying: “My dignity is 80 years old. How can somebody so much younger tell me how to leave with dignity?”


10 posted on 08/31/2010 6:45:50 AM PDT by Ev Reeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RogerFGay
The SOBs in the democrat fascist party are hung up on race because for thirty years it has worked as a way to get their opposition focused on or responding to race rather than the issue in question. Indirection, pure and simple and until now, very, very, effective.

Deal with it by growing a pair and not trying to be "inclusive" on every issue. When such indirection is attempted, make it clear race is straw-man diversion unrelated to the matter at hand, then ignore all further blather about race from the lefty and stay focused on the real issue. Nine times out of ten, handling it that way will have your lefty opponent looking more and more irrational and less and less like he even understands the original issue. If anyone involved thinks you're "racist" for handling it that way, too bad, they've already taken sides so reach those you can. And, repeated applications of this approach ends up moving more than you may expect into the group you can reach.

Regards

11 posted on 08/31/2010 6:46:03 AM PDT by Rashputin (Obama is already insane and sequestered on golf courses or vacations so you won't know it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RogerFGay

If black people didn’t vote lock step with the Bolshecrats, liberals would be the most racist group.


14 posted on 08/31/2010 6:56:17 AM PDT by depressed in 06 (2010, the beginning of the end of our long national nightmare.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RogerFGay

Race is a proxy for “oppressed.” In the communist playbook, the “oppressed” must be made to hate their “oppressors,” leading to class struggle, class warfare, civil strife, civil unrest, and revolution which ushers in the long-awaited communist paradise.


15 posted on 08/31/2010 6:58:04 AM PDT by Leftism is Mentally Deranged (Annoying liberals is my goal. I will not be silenced.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RogerFGay
It was Eisenhower who first started talking about civil rights and a senator, majority leader continued to block it. Who...Lyndon Johnson and after being elected President got it passed and has taken credit for it since.

Another rewrite of history from the Progressives.

18 posted on 08/31/2010 7:19:10 AM PDT by thirst4truth (The left elected a mouth that is unattached to an eye, brain or muscle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RogerFGay

“The Democratic Party has and continues to push for a shift in power from Constitutional rule to one in which the political parties have absolute power, concentrated at the top, Barack Obama.”

Just a little punctuation change ;-)


21 posted on 08/31/2010 7:40:44 AM PDT by vanilla swirl (We are the Patrick Henry we have been waiting for!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RogerFGay

They only use race as a wedge issue to bloc voting demographics.

If you are black, hispanic, female, etc. and you vote for a Republican, you are a race traitor, an uncle tom, an aunt jemimah (all of these terms have been used). A “sell out”.

Recall that Barack Obama wrote about how in college he hung out smoking with the Marxist professors, feminist activists, etc. so he would NOT be a “sell out”.

Your skin color only matters to a Democrat if you can serve The Party. Otherwise you are an enemy of the state.


22 posted on 08/31/2010 7:41:01 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (I want IMPROVEMENT, not just CHANGE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RogerFGay

24 posted on 08/31/2010 7:58:10 AM PDT by Iron Munro (I carry a gun because I'm too young to die and too old to take any more beatings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RogerFGay; Ev Reeman
The Civil Rights movement was indeed a part of the Left's assault on the USA. Its intent was to create division along racial lines, the same as Feminism did along gender lines. Below was supposed to be an AP photo of MLK protesting against the war in Vietnam but only the caption will copy.

53 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., leads a crowd of 125,000 Vietnam War protesters in front of the United Nations in New York on April 15, 1967, as he voices a repeated demand to "Stop the bombing." (AP Photo)

The Civil Rights movement and the protests against the war were all part of the same Marxist effort. LBJ was very active in furthering the Leftist cause with his Great Society social programs, including Medicare, and his attempt to outdo FDR.

After signing the Civil Rights law into effect in 1964 he called Senator Richard Russell of Georgia and said, "That'll keep the n----rs voting Democrat for the next 200 years."

It was all about moving the socialist agenda forward and maintaining power.

25 posted on 08/31/2010 9:52:22 AM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson