Curiouser and curiouser.
To: humblegunner
FWIW, I would have absolutely no problem with a paper ballot.
And it's not the tech that matters. It's the character of the people counting the ballots.
2 posted on
08/29/2010 5:08:01 AM PDT by
mewzilla
(Still voteless in NY-29. Over 400 roll call votes missed and counting...)
To: humblegunner
she was unaware of anyone who might have had a motive to burn down the building.
She cannot determine “motive”?
To: humblegunner
Check to see which incumbent was in trouble for re-election.
That would be a likely place to start looking.
4 posted on
08/29/2010 5:23:37 AM PDT by
TomGuy
To: humblegunner
8 posted on
08/29/2010 5:27:23 AM PDT by
arthurus
(Read Hazlitt's "Economics In One Lesson.")
To: humblegunner
Thank God there is no suggestion that this might throw the coming election itself into doubt......................
10 posted on
08/29/2010 5:33:30 AM PDT by
gunnyg
(WE ARE BEHIND "ENEMY WITHIN" LINES, SURROUNDED, Our 'Novembers' Are Gone, If Ya Can "grok" that.)
To: humblegunner
I'd start checking all the Threads over at DU for someone 'bragging'.
The DUmmies hate Electronic Voting Machines.
Even when they win they *think* it's rigged by republicans. Idiots.
12 posted on
08/29/2010 5:39:33 AM PDT by
Condor51
(SAT CONG!)
To: humblegunner
Now they’ll have to use paper ballots. Much easier to lose, “find” or jigger the results!
18 posted on
08/29/2010 10:15:24 AM PDT by
JimRed
(Excising a cancer before it kills us waters the Tree of Liberty too! TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson