The officer did make multiple statements. His first was "Get in the house" at time 1:34. There was cross talk between Gibson, her father, and her neighbor, but given the officer was using a bullhorn, because he was so far away, you can hear the officer continuing to speak.
The number of times legally should not be relevant, without considering if the subject is allowed to reasonably comply. Gibson, her father, and her neighbor are visually and verbally complying by 12 seconds later. This is not a a no-knock warrant. What is the reasonable time to comply? Given the significant distance between the cop and the subjects, and the fact it was dark, how could he tell they were resisting the 11 seconds before their backs were turned tot he cop?
This prosecutor and judge need to be voted out.
It's highly relevant.