Lol, no one is flaming you (yet), but putting that in so you can gloat over a response sure makes me want to.
The only point that's been made is you can't back up your claim that most of her supporters deify her. You've been challenged to make a list and you won't.
The ball's in your court Chucky, and if you hit it back by posting a reply it means you're an incompetent drooler....
nice trick huh? I just learned that one.....
Gotta love that one, huh? "You replied to me, after I just now posted to you! That means I WIN AT TEH INTERNETS!!!!!1!1!!!" ;)
Thanks, I rather liked the trick myself.
Ok, try and listen (read).
I never said “most” Sarah supporters deify her. I told pissant that I was concerned by the way many people deify her. I even prefaced the comment with my fondness of Sarah, which brought out the conspiracy theorists who think I must be some sort of troll, because as we all know, you can’t simultaneously “love” Sarah and disagree with her, right? (furthering my point)
If you can tell me that you have never seen comments here that are irrationally exuberant for Sarah Palin (sorry, I didn’t catch their screenames), then I don’t know what to tell you. You’re not paying attention.
Sarah is a bold defender of God and the Constitution (despite her McLame endorsement). But she is also a fallable human being. She is not our savior. Though she has many Reaganesque qualities, she is not even Reagan.
I’m not a list keeper. FR is a place where people of a particular bent can come together and exchange ideas. But it doesn’t have to be groupthink.
So, next time I will just send pissant a personal message so that I don’t get everyone all up in arms for nothing.
And like I said, if you are not one of Sarah’s deifiers, why are you worried about it anyway?