[Retired Greyhound]

Thanks, I rather liked the trick myself.

Ok, try and listen (read).

I never said “most” Sarah supporters deify her. I told pissant that I was concerned by the way many people deify her. I even prefaced the comment with my fondness of Sarah, which brought out the conspiracy theorists who think I must be some sort of troll, because as we all know, you can’t simultaneously “love” Sarah and disagree with her, right? (furthering my point)

If you can tell me that you have never seen comments here that are irrationally exuberant for Sarah Palin (sorry, I didn’t catch their screenames), then I don’t know what to tell you. You’re not paying attention.

Sarah is a bold defender of God and the Constitution (despite her McLame endorsement). But she is also a fallable human being. She is not our savior. Though she has many Reaganesque qualities, she is not even Reagan.

I’m not a list keeper. FR is a place where people of a particular bent can come together and exchange ideas. But it doesn’t have to be groupthink.

So, next time I will just send pissant a personal message so that I don’t get everyone all up in arms for nothing.

And like I said, if you are not one of Sarah’s deifiers, why are you worried about it anyway?

[Lakeshark]

The implication to pissant, who also repeats that claim ad nauseum is why people reacted to your claim. I know of one poster who consistently goes over the top with close to an adoration attitude, yet pissant and others (and yes you did that in the one post) continue to slime ALL her supporters with that label.

You ought to be able to see how that might offend a lot of us who, in your words are, people of a particular bent can come together and exchange ideas

I can't imagine why others would be offended by being told they "worship" her can you?

[Chunga]

But she is also a fallable human being. She is not our savior.

Yeah...thanks for the wisdom and revelation. Lots of people had no idea she's a fallible human being until you spoke up.

Pathetic Little Concern Troll.