Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Murkowski Weighs Her Options - could be weighing a fall campaign on a third-party line
Wall Street Journal ^ | August 27, 2010 | John Fund

Posted on 08/27/2010 3:29:41 AM PDT by Zakeet

Lisa Murkowski, the Alaska Senator who apparently lost her GOP primary in a shocking upset to Tea Party candidate Joe Miller, could be weighing a fall campaign on a third-party line.

Final results from Election Day voting show Ms. Murkowski down by 1,668 votes. Many of the absentees left to be counted are from military voters, who probably lean to Mr. Miller. Her chances of making up the necessary votes are slim.

But the Daily Beast reports that the Murkowski camp is weighing the options of running on a minor-party line or as a write-in.

"We are going to take a look at them and see whether the option is there or not, but it's a decision she (Murkowski) has to make," a source close to the Murkowski campaign said. The senator herself calls such talk "premature."

Since the deadline for running as an independent has passed in Alaska, the only ballot line open to the senator would be Libertarian. David Haase, the Libertarian Party Senate nominee, told the Anchorage Daily News he's willing to listen to any proposal. Scott Kohlass, the state chair of the Libertarian Party, claims "there's a chance" the party could replace Mr. Haase with the GOP Senator. But such a move would likely be very unpopular with the party's antigovernment members. Ms. Murkowski's moderate voting record was the major reason Mr. Miller was able to beat her running as a "Constitutional conservative" in the primary.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: 2010election; conservatism; mamagrizzlyroared; murkowski; senate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: Truthsearcher

Good point!


21 posted on 08/27/2010 4:13:44 AM PDT by Old Badger (boy do opportunities abound everywhere for Real Conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice
What we need in America...is a political party called “The Loser Party”. We need a chairman, about a dozen strategy guys (mostly losers), and a couple million in cash to help guys who lose their primary episodes but want to continue on.

Great idea. I nominate a real loser, Bob Beckel, as the chairman or head strategy guy.

22 posted on 08/27/2010 4:14:01 AM PDT by dmzTahoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
Hey Lisa, Here's a logo for your third party:


23 posted on 08/27/2010 4:14:56 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Sore Loser Syndrome.


24 posted on 08/27/2010 4:19:48 AM PDT by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Are the Democrats paying the losers to stay in?


25 posted on 08/27/2010 4:22:07 AM PDT by 5by5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laconic

A-men.


26 posted on 08/27/2010 4:38:10 AM PDT by dr_who
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: laconic

The absolute first goal of any bureaucracy is to preserve itself. Tops all other considerations. The organization first. And if there’s a little something left over for the population they are supposed to be representing and helping, well OK. We’ll just try harder to use it all on ourselves next year.

Their slogan is “If you’ve got what it takes, we’ll take what you’ve got!”


27 posted on 08/27/2010 4:45:54 AM PDT by jwparkerjr (It's the Constitution, Stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

There needs to be state laws across the country. If you join a primary, that’s it!

No backing out after polls show you getting crushed (like Crist). And no joining another party after losing (like Murkowski).

What a joke.


28 posted on 08/27/2010 4:50:54 AM PDT by nhwingut (Palin/Bachmann '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

There needs to be state laws across the country. If you join a primary, that’s it!

No backing out after polls show you getting crushed (like Crist). And no joining another party after losing (like Murkowski).

What a joke.


29 posted on 08/27/2010 4:50:57 AM PDT by nhwingut (Palin/Bachmann '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

I’ve really not paid much attention to this race. But that picture of Murkowski and all of those reporters just gave me a chill down the back. Look at those eyes of hers... Reminded me instantly of the Sith Emperor in the Star Wars movies. Really creepy.


30 posted on 08/27/2010 4:52:40 AM PDT by The Working Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rod1

Too stupid to make it outside her Government job.


31 posted on 08/27/2010 4:57:56 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

She will never get a job at Hooters thats fer sure, maybe hanging sheetrock or a dog washer. Lots of dog wash shops being built in Alaska...and don’t ask me why its suddenly so popular.


32 posted on 08/27/2010 5:03:22 AM PDT by Eye of Unk ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act" G.Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Murkowski looks shell-shocked, I love it! If she runs on a third party platform she will end up getting beat. The regular 2 party rules don’t count in Alaska, and the voters are ornery to begin with up there. She was not that popular to begin with, hence her getting beat in the primary. If you were to give Miller another couple of weeks he would have beat her by 5 percent.


33 posted on 08/27/2010 5:08:55 AM PDT by Paddy Irish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

She and Bill McCullom could Chair the Loser Party. He’s threatening to back Democrats since losing the Governor Primary in Florida.


34 posted on 08/27/2010 5:09:48 AM PDT by poobear ("The greatest tyrannies are always perpetrated in the name of the noblest causes." -- Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Time for her to go bye, bye !


35 posted on 08/27/2010 5:13:52 AM PDT by CORedneck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Well you have to wonder this, “Why would libetarians want her?” She is not for any of their core values.


36 posted on 08/27/2010 5:25:44 AM PDT by q_an_a (a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
Here is why I think she will have a problem getting the Libertarian line: the Libertarians.

While it is true, that Alaska's Libertarian Party is more viable than the rest of the country's, it is still very much a third party (arguably 4th, with the Alaska Independent Party having a stronger history.) The people who form it, by definition, I looking for alternatives to Republicans and Democrats.

If Lisa Murkowski was such a great libertarian, why did the Libertarians put up Haase?! Normally, third parties skip races (or co-endorse when possible) when the candidate is ideal. We all now the reason. Murkowski is all left-libertarian on baby-killing, but she is all old time pol when it comes to pork. Small government is something ALL libertarians can unite on. Picking Murkowski would make as much sense as picking Dan Rostenkowski or Al D'Amato, effective people in their time, but NOT libertarian.

Haase and the head of the party might cave on this, because they see headlines, stars, and maybe paychecks. They will have sold out for access. To folks like me, the Libertarian Party is no more than an escape valve when I cannot vote for the Republican (e.g. Mark Kirk in Illinois). For the people who are actually members, a Murkowski would make the reason for the existence of the party into a joke. It would show that it is a sham party that can be used by powerful people when needed. If they allow her to knock Haase off of the ticket, they will get money, but lose 1/3 to 1/2 of their membership. Libertarians have already marginalized themselves over principle. There is no need for them to put up with this nonsense.
37 posted on 08/27/2010 5:25:57 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

It looks like daddy’s little girl doesn’t like to play by the rules


38 posted on 08/27/2010 5:27:11 AM PDT by personalaccts (Is George W going to protect the border?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mazda77

re: worried about her meal ticket

You bet she is. And the NRC is hustling to her aide because they know very well the Millers of the world will not be their friends once they’re in office. I love it.

In the world of politics there’s something invigorating about the smell of liberals’ and RINO’s FEAR in the air! They KNOW their facing “Take it to Them Tuesday” and there’s not a damn thing they can do to stop the momentum. And that’s the difference between winners and losers. Winners know how to spot the trend and find a way to ride the wave. Losers know nothing more than how to be a spoiler when things don’t go their way.

The NRC really shows its colors when it sends legal assistance up there, not to assure a fair election, but rather to advise an incumbent on holding a seat despite the vote of the people. There’s no other way to see it.

The NRC has become little more than another bureaucratic enabling organization that went from being an effective advocate for its cause to a danger to its cause. It eventually happens to every such organization. Think of groups that have been around for five decades or more. It’s impossible find one that still embraces, in practice, the goals of its founders. AARP, NAACP, AMA, ABA, NOW, NEA AFL-CIO, NFL, the list goes on and on.


39 posted on 08/27/2010 5:32:25 AM PDT by jwparkerjr (It's the Constitution, Stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet




She'll impede you

And deceive you All the better just to leave you

She's atrocious

When she scrubs her back she'll use the toilet bowl brush

All the boys think she's a guy

She's got Marty Feldman eyes
40 posted on 08/27/2010 5:33:29 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson