To: EternalVigilance; SuziQ
Sarah didn't vote in AZ,
So WTF was she DOING in a state attempting (successfully) to sway a primary race in favor of a corrupt, treasonous RINO?
We'll be hearing crickets or SarahBots EV, not much difference, neither have much of anything of substance to say.
356 posted on
08/25/2010 5:59:15 AM PDT by
mkjessup
("Wait by the river and your enemies will float by" - old Japanese proverb, and I'm waitin'.)
To: mkjessup
The Palinistas are already attempting damage control. “She showed up for one day and disappeared”
Yeah;-)
And she forgot to take her 750 radio plugs with her ;-)
382 posted on
08/25/2010 7:13:11 AM PDT by
stephenjohnbanker
((.Go troops! " Vote out RINOS. They screw you EVERY time" Jim Robinson))
To: mkjessup
It doesn’t seem doubtful to me that if Palin had endorsed Hayworth instead of McCain, John Judas would now be facing several months as a lameduck Senator instead of six more years of betraying conservatism.
But that would have required a courageous, principled stand instead of mere personal political ambition.
415 posted on
08/25/2010 8:23:11 AM PDT by
EternalVigilance
(It's a time for choosing. You can have liberalism or you can have America. Pick one.)
To: mkjessup; EternalVigilance
After offering her original endorsement, how often did Sarah fly in to campaign for McCain? Did she do any robo-calls for him, as she did in myriad other campaigns in the country?
I doubt very seriously that anyone who had been inclined to vote against McCain would have changed their vote based on Sarah's basic endorsement. They would have already made their decision based on their years of experience with McCain, and the fact that there was a clear conservative choice in the election.
The majority of Republican voters either wanted to maintain McCain's seniority in the Senate, or they just didn't like JD. It is no more complicated than that.
445 posted on
08/25/2010 11:51:38 AM PDT by
SuziQ
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson