Replies

Good Morning again Paul,

The main reason that Hayworth's campaign failed to unseat McCain was not that Hayworth wasn't a good candidate, ANYone who witnessed the debate between Hayworth and McCain could see for themselves that Hayworth was right on every issue, he clobbered McCain, McCain was a stumbler and a bumbler but the reason he prevailed was because he spent an outlandish sum of money on a primary race that should have been a cake walk to the finish line. McCain and his kiss-blowin', winkin' "you betcha" sockpuppet filled the Arizona airwaves with 20 million dollars worth of lies and distortion about J.D. Hayworth.

It's true. As soon as there were murmurings that Hayworth might challenge him, McCain went into a panic, coerced his former running mate, aka the Wonder Woman from Wasilla into coming into an Arizona primary contest to drag his corrupt ass across the finish line. Sarah Palin spent a LOT of time in Arizona, and StephenJohnBanker can attest to that, as he was highly involved in this primary race 'on the ground', and can tell you chapter and verse how Palin sucked up all the oxygen in Arizona by lying about McCain to the gullible dopes in the electorate, calling McCain a 'REAL CONSERVATIVE', attempting to co-opt the Tea Party vote for McCain, and emphasizing that she "shares John McCain's vision for America".

Now the current spin from the Palinistas is that Sarah 'distanced herself' from McCain in the last month or so, which is no different than the arsonist who sets a rooming house on fire, and then retreats or is that ("advances in a different direction, snicker") to watch the flames soar to the upper floors and consume the residents. The damage was done, Sarah's job was complete. Now she is two-for-two, the traitor-RINO McCain will be back in the Senate for 6 years or until he croaks like his 'dear friend' Fat Teddy, and McCain's RINO-crony Carly Fiorino in California just might eke out a win against Boxer.

The bottom line is that no matter who wins in California, 0bama is going to have two reliable enablers in the Senate, either Boxer or Fiorino (not much difference) and the backstabbing liberal-progressive McCain.

Our founder spoke wise words not too long ago when he said:

"It does matter who Palin supports. If she supports traitors, she’ll lose my support."
218 posted on Wednesday, July 07, 2010 4:55:24 AM by Jim Robinson

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2547510/posts?page=218#218

Well, Sarah Palin supported the traitor, and the traitor won.

That says it all right there. Now real conservatives will be inundated with the predictable GOP mantra of "Gotta vote (R), because we're not (D)!!!"

No worries folks, McCain will keep the Senate seat that once belonged to Barry Goldwater safely in 'Rat hands.

Nice work RINOs.

Now the current spin from the Palinistas is that Sarah 'distanced herself' from McCain in the last month or so, which is no different than the arsonist who sets a rooming house on fire, and then retreats or is that ("advances in a different direction, snicker") to watch the flames soar to the upper floors and consume the residents. The damage was done, Sarah's job was complete. Now she is two-for-two, the traitor-RINO McCain will be back in the Senate for 6 years or until he croaks like his 'dear friend' Fat Teddy, and McCain's RINO-crony Carly Fiorino in California just might eke out a win against Boxer.

Yep. Can't wait to see the Palin Protectorate here on FR post those victory threads on Palin's endorsements - especially about McIinsane.