Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr Rogers
So have you figured out why no legal authority agrees with your interpretation of WKA? No one?

You haven't proven this claim. Next.

They dedicate a third of their decision to discussing how WKA meets the qualifications for NBS, and how NBS is just another phrasing of NBC...and you just wish it away?

I can't wish away something that isn't there in the first place. Nothing in that decision says natural born subject is just another phrasing of NBC. This is more delusion on your part.

Notice, the didn’t say that NBS & NBC are similar, but “precisely analogous”, with the difference only in form of government it falls under.

Again. This is delusion. There is NO statement that NBS and NBC are precisely analagous.

I’m not in meltdown. Every state in the union agrees with me. Every court. Every member of Congress. McCain. Palin. Limbaugh. Coulter. Malkin.

Please provide a citation from every state in the Union saying they agree with you.

Can you explain why everyone has sold out, and only you are true?

You haven't proved EVERYONE has sold out. I do know that a lot of people don't want to be labeled as racist, which is the faither crutch on this issue.

298 posted on 08/26/2010 3:17:02 PM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies ]


To: edge919

Every state allowed Obama on the ballot, knowing his father wasn’t a citizen. No state legislature, no state Sec of State, no Gov, no DA - NO ONE objected. 50 of 50 allowed him on the ballot without complaint.

Or did you miss that fact?

Not one member of Congress raised an objection in Jan 2009.

The only court to try the merits of a birther case rejected them with barely concealed contempt.

There is no one with legal standing who agrees with you. If there was, you could generate a court case, couldn’t you...but you’ve come up empty. Zero. Nada. Zilch.

What color is the sky on the planet where you live?


299 posted on 08/26/2010 3:30:30 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (When the ass brays, don't reply...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies ]

To: edge919; Mr Rogers
Mr. Rogers: So have you figured out why no legal authority agrees with your interpretation of WKA? No one?

edge919: You haven't proven this claim. Next.

LOL. There's good old birther tactic #2 again, shifting of the burden of proof.

Listen, edge919: it's impossible to prove a universal negative. That's why if you want to assert that some legal authority agrees with you, the onus is on YOU to cite one.

The onus is not on us to prove that no one agrees with you. If you can't find a single legal authority to agree with you, then the only valid conclusion is that none does.

300 posted on 08/26/2010 3:40:45 PM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies ]

To: edge919; Mr Rogers
You haven't proved EVERYONE has sold out.

Huh? As far as I'm aware, I don't think Mr. Roger claims anyone sold out.

Aren't you the one who believes Dick Cheney, the entire Republican congressional delegation, and all four conseravtives on SCOTUS sold out?

302 posted on 08/26/2010 3:44:58 PM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson