edge919: You haven't proven this claim. Next.
LOL. There's good old birther tactic #2 again, shifting of the burden of proof.
Listen, edge919: it's impossible to prove a universal negative. That's why if you want to assert that some legal authority agrees with you, the onus is on YOU to cite one.
The onus is not on us to prove that no one agrees with you. If you can't find a single legal authority to agree with you, then the only valid conclusion is that none does.
Rogers made an unsubstantiated claim. It IS HIS BURDEN to prove it, not mine to assume it is true and try to prove it for him. You faithers are terrible at debate. I didn't ask anyone to prove a negative. Rogers says "no legal authority agrees with my interpretation." What part of asking him to prove this claim involves proving a negative??