Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jamese777
Here’s what you said, and I quote you: “It doesn’t create reasonable doubt at all. Obama and the Democrats managed to focus the eligiblity questions on place of birth, particularly by creating an unnecessary resolution for John McCain who admits he was born out of the country, but who can actually prove where he was born.”

Right. I said that, and YOU followed by talking about a long list of court cases that supports my point. Thank you for taking another one on the chin. What you didn't do this time is quote the rest of my post that said, "The focus on Obama’s inability to prove his place of birth kept most people from realizing that his parents’ citizenships mattered too." This undermines your weird argument that I'm trying to blame only Obama or the Democrats for focusing on Obama's place of birth, although they did. Do you not remember how a pointless mention of Obama's alleged birth was stuffed in a resolution about Hawaii's 50th birthday as a state??

I do enjoy your running commentary on what’s happening in the debate while you are also a part of it! Its very entertaining to see you attempting to be a legend in your own mind and declaring your own fantasies of victory!

I'm glad to see you're a good sport and can handle losing with dignity. It keeps me from feeling like I'm gloating too much every time you carelessly lose another argument to me.

For all but the really, really stupid who are living in the state of Denial, Obama has proven where and when he was born and he has had that information backed up by the Governor of that state, the Director of Health of that State, the Attorney General of that state and the Registrar of Vital Statistics for that State.

To paraphrase Ronald Reagan. There you go again. The only really, really stupid PEOPLE (you left that out) who are living in the state of Denial, are those who believe what you claim. Stupid. Gullible. Useful idiots. Tools. Doofuses. Faithers. All birds of the same feather.

295 posted on 08/26/2010 2:57:04 PM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies ]


To: edge919

Right. I said that, and YOU followed by talking about a long list of court cases that supports my point. Thank you for taking another one on the chin. What you didn’t do this time is quote the rest of my post that said, “The focus on Obama’s inability to prove his place of birth kept most people from realizing that his parents’ citizenships mattered too.” This undermines your weird argument that I’m trying to blame only Obama or the Democrats for focusing on Obama’s place of birth, although they did. Do you not remember how a pointless mention of Obama’s alleged birth was stuffed in a resolution about Hawaii’s 50th birthday as a state??


Get back to me when a birther lawsuit isn’t being laughed out of court. I see that the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals is requiring Mario Apuzzo to pay court costs for Kerchner v Obama.

The mention of Hawaii as Obama’s birthplace was a political tactic of Congressman Neil Abercrombie who is running for Governor of Hawaii. It was a way to force members of Congress to go on record as to whether they were birthers or not. The vote was 373-0 in favor. So we can assume that there are 62 “birthers.”


I’m glad to see you’re a good sport and can handle losing with dignity. It keeps me from feeling like I’m gloating too much every time you carelessly lose another argument to me.

As long as you remain as entertaining as you are, I have no problem with you continuing to have your delusions of grandeur. They are kind of fun! If your ego needs for you to declare victory after every post, you go right ahead and declare those victories!


316 posted on 08/26/2010 6:45:30 PM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson