Right. I said that, and YOU followed by talking about a long list of court cases that supports my point. Thank you for taking another one on the chin. What you didn’t do this time is quote the rest of my post that said, “The focus on Obama’s inability to prove his place of birth kept most people from realizing that his parents’ citizenships mattered too.” This undermines your weird argument that I’m trying to blame only Obama or the Democrats for focusing on Obama’s place of birth, although they did. Do you not remember how a pointless mention of Obama’s alleged birth was stuffed in a resolution about Hawaii’s 50th birthday as a state??
The mention of Hawaii as Obama’s birthplace was a political tactic of Congressman Neil Abercrombie who is running for Governor of Hawaii. It was a way to force members of Congress to go on record as to whether they were birthers or not. The vote was 373-0 in favor. So we can assume that there are 62 “birthers.”
You can't have delusions of grandeur when your opponent doesn't even try to make a contrary point. Yet again you support my argument for me by saying, "It was a way to force members of Congress to go on record as to whether they were birthers or not." You're admitting here that democrats are focusing on place of birth and not Obama's foreign national father. I get the feeling you don't understand how a debate works. I'm glad to teach you whenever you can focus.