How are they violating that section? Were religious buildings at that site before? Are other churches being built there, but not the mosque?
I’m not sure how to answer your question and whether or not that is a prerequisite under that section. I’m not a Mark Levin. I’m just some jerk with a blackberry phone.
“How are they violating that section? Were religious buildings at that site before? Are other churches being built there, but not the mosque?”
If that’s your interpretation could be propose the building of a christian place of worship to at least tie this up in court to at least prolong this building of the mosque? On your side guy..