“How are they violating that section? Were religious buildings at that site before? Are other churches being built there, but not the mosque?”
If that’s your interpretation could be propose the building of a christian place of worship to at least tie this up in court to at least prolong this building of the mosque? On your side guy..
Here is a little monkey wrench to the argument, remember, they are selling it as a ‘cultural center’ that happens to have a mosque in it (like a chapel in a hospital), not a mosque itself. I don’t see RLUIPA protecting cultural centers.