And therein lies the rub. I consider it rude to interrupt a conversation, and I always view these things as conversations. I would be wise to recognise that the person on the other end is probably not taking their medicine any longer, and just drop it. I can't convince anyone who doesn't read the post or understand the very obvious meanings in them that they are tilting at windmills of their own conception. But, for some reason I will keep responding even though the other person clearly has bats in their belfry, so to speak. Dotty, if you follow the idiom. A nutter. Well, anyway, I will keep posting when they appear in my pings, and it goes on and on, and nowhere because they just want to show off their new little epithet, most of which are hardly impressive or even new. Dhimmitude, Paulestinian, muzzie, demonrat, or whatever it is they think they can sneak in in some way. I don't guess they realise how lame this is, and childish, but probably at their advanced age they want to seem young and stylish. They come off like petulant schoolchildren posting on the DailyKos, where they all use these made-up insults. Probably things like Re-pubic-ans or the like. All exceedingly young, and oh so cool. Or, as the kids are saying, neato daddy-o.
So, anyway, good luck to you. You obviously have needs. I can't help you with that. I will just say you are still dead wrong, and homosexual marriage is evil. And pornography is not a conservative idea, and if you want to promote it do it to somebody else, and quit trying to convince me. You are just wrong.
Peace out, daddy-o.
“I consider it rude to interrupt a conversation, and I always view these things as conversations. I would be wise to recognise that the person on the other end is probably not taking their medicine any longer, and just drop it.”
I was pinged into the conversation. And yes, you would be wise to drop it. But you won’t. Draw your own conclusion.