[DCPatriot]

I believe in the sanctity of marriage between a man and a woman.

But there are fiscal conservatives...who vote BTW, who understand that homosexuality is simply different wiring inside the womb.

They can no better change themselves into REAL heteros...than you can stop being an ignoramus.

[driftdiver]

While I agree cmj is an ignoramus I’d be interested in your supporting evidence that being homosexual is determined in the womb.

There are plenty of examples of homosexuals who have chosen to leave that lifestyle and have led healthy and happy lives.

[cmj328]

If you won’t defend marriage you won’t defend any tradition, including the rule of law and the Constitution, and the peace of our shores. What use are you as an American? Send these people away. They are AWOL against our domestic enemies.

And your stupid biological argument—do you think that human nature has changed in the last 50 years? Grow up and accept your role in life.

[fml]

I believe in the sanctity of marriage between a man and a woman. But there are fiscal conservatives...who vote BTW, who understand that homosexuality is simply different wiring inside the womb

There are also fiscal conservative who know nothing of the sort.

What does one have to do with the other?

[grey_whiskers]

But there are fiscal conservatives...who vote BTW, who understand that homosexuality is simply different wiring inside the womb.

BFD -- that's irrelevant to a Christian.

Follow along for a sec, it's not the argument you're expecting.

Let us say (merely for argument's sake) that in the case of homosexuality, we have *solved* the "nature vs. nurture" debate and shown there is a strong biochemical / neuronic component to homosexuality.

Great.

Now how about heterosexuality? Every would agree readily that the basis for that is hard-wired into the vast majority of humans.

...and yet, despite that, nobody is saying that this hard-wiring gives heterosexuals a license to have sex whenever or with whosoever they want.

In particular, Christians *still* insist (on paper; many fall short of the ideal) that one must rigidly control sexual behaviour, and that the only legitimate expression of full intercourse is between a man and wife.

And furthermore, for most of the lifetime of the Church, divorce was *STRONGLY* discouraged at best.

So why is it, that the assertion that homosexuality is latent in the brain, is suddenly supposed to give all kinds of license to *homo*sexual behaviour -- even in the face of prohibitions in the Bible against *ANY AND ALL* such activity, in terms even stronger than the condemnation of fornication?

Cheers!