There is also a large contingent of Muslim creationists.
Science suffers in their culture due to it.
The main reason science suffers is when it makes claims as fact that are not substantiated by the data (i.e. Global Warming). Science will only be science when it strives for complete openess and honesty - it must ‘evolve’ away from gov/political funding to regain it’s reputation.
For all those skeptics and creationists out there please take a look at this site below authored by a former believer in evolutionary dogma. Yes micro-evolution is a scientifically proven fact but a resounding NO to most all the other fanciful evolutionary claims.
From my links page:
Center for Scientific Creation - In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood
http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/IntheBeginningTOC.html
Also I have another link regarding the alleged scientific ages for the Earth and Universe. A good scientific theory does not ignore/disgard any/all non-supporting data.
Science suffers in Muslim culture, but not due to a belief in Creation.
It suffers specifically because it is apostasy to “chain Allah” and expect the rules to be unchanging.
Expecting predictability of outcomes of experiments is “chaining Allah”. So you can see why this would effectively preclude any scientific advancement.