Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child

Olson’s a lawyer and has litigated many cases so he must know that the opposition is hardly ‘knee-jerk’ (his words). But use of that term is common when people are attempting to dismiss the mountains of evidence that damn their own case.


52 posted on 08/19/2010 7:10:24 AM PDT by relictele (Me lumen vos umbra regit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: relictele

Sowell calls such tactics “arguing without arguments”.

It’s much easier to dismiss your opponent or his argument
than to actually address it and refute it.


54 posted on 08/19/2010 7:12:59 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson