Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: throwback

Government needs to get out of the marrying business.


2 posted on 08/19/2010 6:19:28 AM PDT by ronnyquest (There's a communist living in the White House! Now, what are you going to do about it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ronnyquest
Government needs to get out of the marrying business.

Agreed.

Marriage is a Sacrament of the Church.

Government should stay out of it altogether. Otherwise...


19 posted on 08/19/2010 6:32:55 AM PDT by paulycy (Demand Constitutionality Now: Islamo-Marxism is Evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: ronnyquest
Government needs to get out of the marrying business.

Reposted for truth!

Has anyone ever stopped to ask:
1. why the government needs to define marriage?
2. when / where the people ever GAVE the government the power to define it?

28 posted on 08/19/2010 6:39:56 AM PDT by An.American.Expatriate (Here's my strategy on the War against Terrorism: We win, they lose. - with apologies to R.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: ronnyquest

that is a Homo-con

Government is in the recording inheritance and property rights business.

No government in marriage then you can never inherit anything since lineage can never be legally established via legitimacy.

We used to have a non-government system. it was full of fraud and abandonment. Who needs divorce and childsupport payments, just leave and abandon and you have no fear of consequence.

Government out of marriage is the goal of the left and a specific goal of the homosexuals.


29 posted on 08/19/2010 6:40:00 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: ronnyquest
Government needs to get out of the marrying business.

In the long run, that's the only solution to the underlying problem.

40 posted on 08/19/2010 6:51:45 AM PDT by TrueRightWing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: ronnyquest

“How could a politically active, lifelong Republican, a veteran of the Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush administrations, challenge the “traditional” definition of marriage and press for an “activist” interpretation of the Constitution to create another “new” constitutional right?”

Ted, you answered your own question. You are a lifelong REPUBLICAN, NOT a lifelong conservative. And as Juan McCain and many others have taught us over and over, there is a MONUMENTAL difference.


108 posted on 08/19/2010 8:16:20 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: ronnyquest

The government isn’t in the “marriage business.” Where do you get this idea? From the left?


125 posted on 08/19/2010 8:59:20 AM PDT by fwdude (Anita Bryant was right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: ronnyquest

Agree 100% and that should be the consevative position—who you swear allegiance to is none of my business, and if a gay wants to do it, fine—he’s not asking MY blessing, which I do not give.

Keep it in the church(es), since it’s a matter of morality and personal belief, anyway.


208 posted on 08/19/2010 10:44:18 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Forget it, Jake. It's Chinatown. -- written by Robert Towne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson