To: stephenjohnbanker; Gilbo_3; sickoflibs; NFHale; hiredhand; Liz; DoughtyOne; mkjessup
RE :”
dont demand that anyone toe the line for my theology [unlike muzzies] but the institution of marriage predates our society, as does divorce...any tinkering with it by man is simply for greed, or to attempt to avoid repentence for their own past & current sexual indiscretions...
It is one thing to claim that a law that congress passes is unconstitutional. But these liberal judges order the local governments to issue marriage licenses for the first time in history. They are claiming a lack of action, the non-issuing same sex couple marriage licenses, is forbid by the US constitution (suddenly) and they therefore order the state to do it regardless of the law and the state constitution. Sexual desire defines a special protected class with new rights to government action.
Watching Ted Olsen argue this liberal logic is sickening.
Ann Coulter put it best. " If you are going to replace a 10,000 year old tradition, at least give us a vote on it.'
156 posted on
08/19/2010 9:50:02 AM PDT by
sickoflibs
("It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the federal spending=tax delayed")
To: sickoflibs; NFHale; hiredhand; Liz; DoughtyOne; mkjessup
See post 124. I rest my case.
160 posted on
08/19/2010 9:53:17 AM PDT by
stephenjohnbanker
(.Go troops! " Vote out RINOS. They screw you EVERY time" Jim Robinson)
To: sickoflibs
Barbara Olsen must be spinning...
Ted should know better than this.
Ann is exactly right.
170 posted on
08/19/2010 9:58:40 AM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(UniTea! It's not Rs vs Ds you dimwits. It's Cs vs Ls. Cut the crap & lets build for success.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson