Just found your six reasons why you take Obama’s birth myth on faith. I will explain why you put too much faith in this circumstantial evidence, some of which appears to be fraudulent.
1. The alleged COLB as originally presented was redacted and showed signs of digital manipulation. The factlack dot org photos don’t match the original FTS scans and have had embedded data scrubbed which indicated the photos were taken several months before they were claimed to have been taken. The photos include a certificate number than can be legally verified, yet the state of Hawaii refuses. Weight of evidence presented: Zero.
2. Newspaper announcements don’t list a place of birth. 1961 natality reports indicates dozens of Hawaiian children born out of state. There’s nothing to indicate that birth announcements were only for local births. Also, the newspaper announcements list a residence never associated with Obama’s father, indicating the possibility of being fraudulent registered. Weight of evidence: Zero.
3. The date when a record was filed with a state has no bearing on where the birth took place. Weight of evidence: Zero.
4. Common sense?? You claim a lack of money, yet SAD showed up in the state of Washington the same month Obama was born and for the next year or so, attended college as a single mother. Someone gave her money for school and to travel to Washington, so your common sense claim is baseless. Weight of evidence: Zero.
5. Fukino’s original claim was that the state has an original birth certificate on file. This is no guarantee that it says he was born in Hawaii. Her second claim was that other vital records supposably verified Obama was born in Hawaii. Hold up. She just switched her terminology. The ONLY record that verifies a place of birth is an original birth certificate, but Fukino chose NOT to cite that record as verifying a place of birth. She also chose not to identify what records she looked at instead of the original birth certificate. Without knowing what these records are, there’s no way to ascertain the reliability of this claim. Weight of evidence: Zero.
6. The only U.S. passport Obama has ever shown is his current passport. Prior to holding office as a senator, there’s no indication Obama traveled on a U.S. passport. Second, passports can be obtained on the basis of secondary evidence for those who don’t possess a legal birth certificate. There’s no evidence Obama ever used a birth certificate to obtain any U.S. passport. Weight of evidence: very low.
7. This is weak. Thanks to the presence of interpreters, it’s difficult to ascertain what was said and by whom. What doesn’t make sense is Obama’s grandmother saying she was present for Obama’s birth for anywhere but Kenya. We’re forced to believe she was lying or was misunderstood. In the meantime, Kenyan politicians say he was born there and several newspapers characterized Obama as Kenyan-born. Obama’s own wife said Kenya IS his home country and that he ‘returned’ home on one of his trips to Kenya. Does any of this add validity to the claim Obama was born in Hawaii. Of course not.
In summation,you have 1 out of 6 circumstantial pieces of evidence that ‘backs up’ Obama being born in Hawaii. The silly part is that we are left with only circumstantial evidence instead of hard evidence like an original, doctor-signed birth certificate that can be validated as genuine.
You can lead a horse to water but you cant make him drink.
Evidence of anything other than Honolulu birth: Zero.