Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 103198

Um no. Bushehr has been downplayed publicly in order to defend the Russians who built it. Bushehr is capable of producing a quarter ton of plutonium per year, enough for 30 bombs. The other sites aren’t nearly as important.


116 posted on 08/17/2010 12:58:45 PM PDT by Dave346
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]


To: Dave346

Really? Frack, I didn’t know that.

Ah well, Bushehr really is ‘Uncle Target’ then.


117 posted on 08/17/2010 1:00:44 PM PDT by agere_contra (...what if we won't eat the dog food?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]

To: Dave346
My point is the fissile Plutonium production will be limited by the core residence time. This will transmute portions of the Pu-239 into Pu-240 (and of course Pu-241 -> Pu-242) which is a neutron sink. A heavy water reactor or graphite reactor with a short core residence time would work. I don't think this plant will work to enable the Iranians to produce any weapons grade Plutonium - but lots of radioactive isotopes and ‘mixed’ Plutonium.
121 posted on 08/17/2010 3:10:33 PM PDT by 103198
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson