Your comment, “And yet, curiously, even though the fact itself was well-known, and even though the Presidential campaign started in early 2007, no one suggested that the mere fact of having a Kenyan daddy made him ineligible until November 2008.” is factually incorrect. Many people raised the issue before November 2008.
World Net Daily asked in June 2008. http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=66787
Your implication that no one cared until after the election is insulting and does a great disservice to the people who were trying to warn the American people about Obama not being eligible.
"Many"? Then it shouldn't be hard to point to some.
World Net Daily asked in June 2008. http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=66787
No, read that article carefully. Nowhere in it does WND claim that Obama would be ineligible solely because he had a Kenyan father. Nowhere in it does WND claim that even if he was born in Hawaii, his father's citizenship would make him ineligible. Rather, the only thing WND says is that if he was born outside the US, then his father's citizenship might come into play.
Thanks for saying this so very well.
When I think how we tried to get people to listen to this and issues of his friends and associates...well, it is not a relief to finally be getting the coverage we needed long ago.