Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Says Gay Marriages Won't Resume In California Until Next Wednesday
Fox40 ^

Posted on 08/12/2010 12:44:17 PM PDT by freedomwarrior998

SACRAMENTO - Judge Vaughn Walker has lifted a stay in order regarding last week's verdict that stated Proposition 8, California's law that defined marriage as a union between one man and one woman, is unconstitutional.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; US: California
KEYWORDS: caglbt; gayjudge; gaystapo; homobama; homosexualagenda; judicialtyranny; lavendermafia; marryadog; perverts; prop8; samesexmarriage; sodomhusseinobama; sodomitejudge; vaughnwalker; wedyourhorse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-139 next last
To: freedomwarrior998

If you can’t post the correct headline, don’t bother posting...


21 posted on 08/12/2010 12:51:38 PM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomwarrior998
Somehow the media even Fox don't use the word HOMOSEXUAL, considered deragatory by homosexuals themselves.

22 posted on 08/12/2010 12:51:55 PM PDT by hamboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomwarrior998
Somehow the media even Fox don't use the word HOMOSEXUAL, considered deragatory by homosexuals themselves.

23 posted on 08/12/2010 12:52:03 PM PDT by hamboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moose4

Wonderful, so, I guess my question is, why do we bother to vote? All it takes is a little judge shopping and you can probably get anything passed.


24 posted on 08/12/2010 12:52:21 PM PDT by Lx (Do you like it, do you like it. Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: oneamericanvoice

No, he definitely lifted the stay. He merely delayed entry of final judgment until the 18th. I presume to give the proponents of Prop 8 time to seek a stay from the Ninth Circuit or SCOTUS.

The whole premise of getting these fake “marriages” performed as quickly as possible, is to give the left another tool to use against Justice Kennedy down the road. They want to be able to say “See all these people have been getting ‘married’ since this decision and nothing bad has happened.” This filthy diseased sodomite has stacked the deck against marriage in every way possible.


25 posted on 08/12/2010 12:53:22 PM PDT by freedomwarrior998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: freedomwarrior998

How else would a pervert in a black dress rule?


26 posted on 08/12/2010 12:53:25 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (''I don't regret setting bombs,I feel we didn't do enough.'' ->Bill Ayers,Hussein's mentor,9/11/01)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomwarrior998

If there was standing at the District Court level there is standing now too.


27 posted on 08/12/2010 12:53:37 PM PDT by Clump (the tree of liberty is withering like a stricken fig tree)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

There are already two classes. Gay couples were married in the time between the CA Supreme Court striking down the law prohibiting gay marriage and the time that Prop 8 was passed which amended the CA constitution.


28 posted on 08/12/2010 12:53:42 PM PDT by Lou Budvis (Refudiate 0bama '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: freedomwarrior998

Any member of Congress who refuses to impeach this judge should themselves lose their jobs forthwith.


29 posted on 08/12/2010 12:53:52 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (They say money is the mother's milk of politics, but it's not. It's one hundred proof corn liquor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomwarrior998
Since the intrusion of the State into marriage has naturally led to this disgrace and degradation...maybe it's time for Christians to return to the original traditions of marriage in the Church. (not talking about the heretical sects who perform these silly Felliniesque homosexual ceremonies for entertainment purposes)

Why bother with civil anyway? The civil world has become a mockery.

30 posted on 08/12/2010 12:53:54 PM PDT by eleni121 (Thank you Jennifer Lopez - human beings do not sing for rapistTurks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
It’s all over now.

Once there are gay couples married in California it will establish two classes of gay citizens and the SCOTUS and especially Justice Kennedy does not like separate classes and does love the Equal Protection Clause.


Bah. There were already gay "married" couples in CA after the last court fiasco which started this whole process in the first place. If you'll recall, it was another rogue court that decided that California's state constitution enshrined the right of gay people to defile marriage, which is what prompted Prop 8 in the first place. Between that ridiculous court decision and passage of Prop 8, there were all kinds of gay "marriages" performed.
31 posted on 08/12/2010 12:54:41 PM PDT by fr_freak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: freedomwarrior998

I’ve heard that the judge is gay. If this is true is this a conflict of interest? At this point, I don’t like it though, the people of the country must look at a Constitutional ammendment. If we don’t, the question will come up again and again.

If the judges ruling is appealed and goes to the Supreme Court and they agree with the local judge, then it’s my understanding that gay marriage is legal in all 50 states.


32 posted on 08/12/2010 12:54:56 PM PDT by RC2 (Remember who we are. "I am America")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lx

“None of the factors the court weighs in considering a
motion to stay favors granting a stay. Accordingly, proponents’motion for a stay is DENIED. Doc #705. The clerk is DIRECTED to United States District Court For the Northern District of California enter judgment forthwith.

That judgment shall be STAYED until August 18, 2010 at 5 PM PDT at which time defendants and all persons under their control or supervision shall cease to apply or enforce Proposition 8.”


33 posted on 08/12/2010 12:55:24 PM PDT by TheDon (The Democrat Party, the party of the KKK (tm))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: freedomwarrior998

Does this mean that Prop 8 is still enforced in the southern half of California and that it is only overturned in the northern part of the state that is under the Federal District Court of Northern California?


34 posted on 08/12/2010 12:55:37 PM PDT by old republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: freedomwarrior998

I’m looking forward to watching Divorce Court on TV when two old queens are lispingly fighting over who gets the Judy Garland CD collections and the services of Raul, the gay Cuban Pool Boy.


35 posted on 08/12/2010 12:57:58 PM PDT by Le Chien Rouge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lx

Beats me. The judiciary is now the primary blunt instrument that the ruling class uses to keep us peons in our place.

Yet another reason to get out there and vote in November, and sweep conservatives into office so we can start replacing these clowns as they leave the bench. Or impeaching them if need be.

}:-)4


36 posted on 08/12/2010 12:59:30 PM PDT by Moose4 (November 2, 2010--the day that "YES WE CAN" becomes "OH NO YOU DIN'T")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Clump

The proponents of Prop 8 intervened, that isn’t exactly the same thing as having Standing.

Because the Governor and other defendants won’t defend the law, indeed, they have fought Prop 8 along with the filthy sodomites the entire way, Walker is claiming that there may not be standing for appeal.

From a strategic perspective, I wonder if it might be better for the Prop 8 folks to drop the appeal, and then start the case from scratch in a more conservative area.

For example, get a couple of token defendants, have them sue in a Conservative State in front of a Conservative judge. Let the judge rule against them and stack the record against the perverts, just like this homosexual piece of filth did in this case. Then, have those defendants appeal in a Conservative Appellate Court, all the way up to SCOTUS.

We need to use the left’s own tactics against them.


37 posted on 08/12/2010 12:59:44 PM PDT by freedomwarrior998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: hamboy

Let me say this as a *Christian* and a Sinner saved by Grace, and I apologize to the LORD if am wrong...

BUT I AM SICK OF THESE WHINEY FAGS!


38 posted on 08/12/2010 1:00:00 PM PDT by TaraP (He never offered our victories without fighting but he said help would always come in time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: freedomwarrior998

Fabulous Fascism


39 posted on 08/12/2010 1:00:22 PM PDT by william clark (Ecclesiastes 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: old republic

No, it would apply statewide.


40 posted on 08/12/2010 1:00:30 PM PDT by freedomwarrior998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-139 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson