Posted on 08/12/2010 12:44:17 PM PDT by freedomwarrior998
If you can’t post the correct headline, don’t bother posting...
Wonderful, so, I guess my question is, why do we bother to vote? All it takes is a little judge shopping and you can probably get anything passed.
No, he definitely lifted the stay. He merely delayed entry of final judgment until the 18th. I presume to give the proponents of Prop 8 time to seek a stay from the Ninth Circuit or SCOTUS.
The whole premise of getting these fake “marriages” performed as quickly as possible, is to give the left another tool to use against Justice Kennedy down the road. They want to be able to say “See all these people have been getting ‘married’ since this decision and nothing bad has happened.” This filthy diseased sodomite has stacked the deck against marriage in every way possible.
How else would a pervert in a black dress rule?
If there was standing at the District Court level there is standing now too.
There are already two classes. Gay couples were married in the time between the CA Supreme Court striking down the law prohibiting gay marriage and the time that Prop 8 was passed which amended the CA constitution.
Any member of Congress who refuses to impeach this judge should themselves lose their jobs forthwith.
Why bother with civil anyway? The civil world has become a mockery.
I’ve heard that the judge is gay. If this is true is this a conflict of interest? At this point, I don’t like it though, the people of the country must look at a Constitutional ammendment. If we don’t, the question will come up again and again.
If the judges ruling is appealed and goes to the Supreme Court and they agree with the local judge, then it’s my understanding that gay marriage is legal in all 50 states.
“None of the factors the court weighs in considering a
motion to stay favors granting a stay. Accordingly, proponents’motion for a stay is DENIED. Doc #705. The clerk is DIRECTED to United States District Court For the Northern District of California enter judgment forthwith.
That judgment shall be STAYED until August 18, 2010 at 5 PM PDT at which time defendants and all persons under their control or supervision shall cease to apply or enforce Proposition 8.”
Does this mean that Prop 8 is still enforced in the southern half of California and that it is only overturned in the northern part of the state that is under the Federal District Court of Northern California?
I’m looking forward to watching Divorce Court on TV when two old queens are lispingly fighting over who gets the Judy Garland CD collections and the services of Raul, the gay Cuban Pool Boy.
Beats me. The judiciary is now the primary blunt instrument that the ruling class uses to keep us peons in our place.
Yet another reason to get out there and vote in November, and sweep conservatives into office so we can start replacing these clowns as they leave the bench. Or impeaching them if need be.
}:-)4
The proponents of Prop 8 intervened, that isn’t exactly the same thing as having Standing.
Because the Governor and other defendants won’t defend the law, indeed, they have fought Prop 8 along with the filthy sodomites the entire way, Walker is claiming that there may not be standing for appeal.
From a strategic perspective, I wonder if it might be better for the Prop 8 folks to drop the appeal, and then start the case from scratch in a more conservative area.
For example, get a couple of token defendants, have them sue in a Conservative State in front of a Conservative judge. Let the judge rule against them and stack the record against the perverts, just like this homosexual piece of filth did in this case. Then, have those defendants appeal in a Conservative Appellate Court, all the way up to SCOTUS.
We need to use the left’s own tactics against them.
Let me say this as a *Christian* and a Sinner saved by Grace, and I apologize to the LORD if am wrong...
BUT I AM SICK OF THESE WHINEY FAGS!
Fabulous Fascism
No, it would apply statewide.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.