What about the seperation of church and state?
Or does that not apply to mosque and state?
A state $65 BILLION in debt is going to GIVE $millions away to a religion, and yet tax others of another religion to foot the bill?
How would government giving land to a religious group not be seen as establishing a religion?
islam is NOT a religion. It is a political entity with a “holy” book that instructs its adherents how to kill and conquer. Catholics, Baptist, Jews, Mathodists, Lutherans, and eve the Amish are true religious groups. They don’t go around killing to conquer.
That’s how Patterson could have given governmant land to the muzzies and not violate the the seperation of church and state deal.
How COULD Paterson GIVE government land?
I’m not sure if “providing” an alternate site means that the land would be given away. There are different interpretations of what “providing” might entail. It might mean he could grease the skids (preferably with bacon fat) to obtain another site. It doesn’t necessarily mean the land would be gifted away— I do not believe that would be legal.
mazda77 hit the nail on the head, however (#6). Paterson has outed their agenda, otherwise why else would they not even listen to what he had to say...
And Mr. K has also nailed down what the specifics of that agenda entail (#5)...
>>How would government giving land to a religious group not be seen as establishing a religion?
But, this is ISLAM. The US government is trying to make it the state religion. Homosexuals, drug users, adulterers, and other liberals think that a strong Islam in the US can defeat the “evil Christians”. To prevent the “Christian Theocracy” that they hysterically fear, they are willing to create a theocracy a thousand times more strict than their worst nightmares.
They are stupid. Incredibly stupid and suicidal. Its like they’d hire an violent ex-con to sit in their bedroom at night to protect them from the imaginary monster in the closet.
exactly!