Newt Gingrich's Skeletons: His Past Wives

Newt Gingrich is a phoenix. He's risen again and again from political ashes and appears to be ascendant once more. Rumored to be running for president in 2012, Gingrich is an icon in the Republican Party, an eminence grise at a time of lost leadership. His fall from grace in the late 1990s seems a blip, rather than a political ending. Thus the cover story in Esquire Magazine, September issue, written by John H. Richardson.

If anyone knows something about Newt Gingrich, it is his former wife, Marianne, and Richardson scored an interview with her. She is someone with a bone to pick, one that stems from the ending of their 18-year marriage with an affair. She knows a lot, and has never before spoken out. Richardson notes she is a "Tea Party" conservative. She believes in what she thought Newt Gingrich believed in, too.

Newt proposed to Marianne (she was 28, he 36) in 1980 while his first wife, Jackie, was in the hospital recovering from treatments for uterine cancer. He hadn't yet even asked her for a divorce. Newt met Jackie in high school. She was his geometry teacher. He was sixteen, she was 25. When he left, Jackie was nearly destitute. Jackie, the Esquire story reports, "had to get a court order just to pay her utility bills." These are among the personal tidbits that Marianne Gingrich (she kept his name, these 10 years since the divorce and subsequent annulment), drops casually into the Esquire writer's lap as she smokes endlessly, each cigarette "down to the filter."

Some of the revelations are small -- Newt hated to be criticized for his weight, more than anything. Some of them challenge the folksy narrative Gingrich has created for himself, about his mother, for example. "She was pretty drugged up for a long time," Marianne tells Richardson.

Some of them are explosive in a town that privileges quiet staffers over mouthy associates. "He's a sociopath, but he's our sociopath," Marianne Gingrich quotes his staffers as saying, during the late 1990s when the House Ethics Committee investigated Gingrich's GOPAC's donations and his charity fundraising came under suspicion. Callista Bisek, Gingrich's current wife, became his mistress first and his wife second (really third, if one is counting wives), while Marianne was home visiting her mother. In 1999, Marianne had just been diagnosed with multiple sclerosis. Newt asked Callista to marry him before he and Marianne had agreed to divorce. The affair had been going on for years. Newt compared Marianne to a "Jaguar" and Callista to a "Chevrolet" and said he needed a Chevrolet, not a Jaguar, according to the Esquire story. In 2000 the couple wed.

Even so Gingrich continued to give speeches about family. "How do you give that speech and do what you are doing?" Marianne asked him. They were in the death throes of their relationship. "It doesn't matter what I do," he told her, according to the Esquire story. "People need to hear what I have to say. There's no one else who can say what I say. It doesn't matter what I live."

He recently converted to Catholicism and asked Marianne to agree to an annulment. "It has no meaning," Marianne Gingrich told Richardson. (Amy Sullivan, writing in Time magazine last year, noted that it might be a prep move for a 2012 bid, and also noted that Callista is a lifelong Catholic and sings in the choir.)

The former Mrs. Gingrich believes that Gingrich's do-what-I say, not what I do philosophy will be his undoing. "There's no way," she tells Richardson, of Gingrich becoming president. "He could have been president. But when you try and change your history too much, and try and recolor it because you don't like the way it was or you want it to be different to prove something new...you lose touch with who you really are. You lose your way...He believes that what he says in public and how he lives doesn't have to be connected. If you believe that, then yeah, you can run for president."

Richardson met with Gingrich in his Washington, D.C., K Steet offices. But all of his questions were met with the narrative that Gingrich always offers. His childhood, for example, was all "sugar pies" and "fabulous." (Richardson writes that Gingrich's mother was manic-depressive.) Gingrich says his conversion to Catholicism was for Bisek. "Callista and I kid that I'm four and she's five and therefore she gets to be in charge because the difference between four and five is a lot," he told Richardson, maintaining a cheerful, unruffled air throughout their interview. Marianne Gingrich says the line was hers, not her former husband's.

Gatun: I agree with everything you say, even though it is quite depressing when you think about it.

As far as decent men to lead this country, I nominate Congressman Paul Ryan -- smart, fiscally conservative, married, father of three, has a plan to get us out of debt, and does not want to be President. Did I mention he's good looking too? I believe that he has been threatened and he's concerned for his children.

I think Rick Santorum is another one -- but he has been tarnished by losiing the PA election to that liar, Casey.

I also love Eric Cantor, but I know nothing about his personal life. So, that leaves us to looking for decent women -- Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachmann both come to mind, and you can see what the lamestream media have done to them!

Pray.

Paul Ryan

My sister worked for a one term senator after the 1994 elections. She came back very jaded about “conservative” leaders.

The GOP knew about Newt and his women (there were more mistresses), and often they openly mocked those who elected them in parties (one of my sister’s jobs was setting up functions).

You don’t get to that level being a decent person. You get there by being a snake. I vote, but I do so realizing that the guy I voting for is lying to me and using me. I only hope that I can use him to advance causes I care about a little bit.

Looks like Newt couldn't keep it in his pants. He was 16 years old when he met his teacher, only to leave her while she was recovering from cancer, and delivered his divorce papers while she was at the hospital. In the meantime, he was hot after Marianne (who was younger than him), only to drop her years later for someone younger than her. What a real sweetheart.

He compared his wives to cars. He obviously sees women as objects for his pleasure, a sexual thing to use and discard whenever he grows bored.

I don't care what he does with his life, but to preach about morals and social codes with his history of extramarital sex (and God knows what else) is a joke.

Like I said before, Newt couldn't get elected as a night watchman at Macy's.

I lost faith in Newt when he didn't have a peep to say during the whole Clinton/Lewinsky Impeachment debacle.

It was what he had to say in those days that killed him for me---he was saying, to every last House Republican trying to put the brakes on Newtie and the Blowfish's nasty little habit of ramping up budgets that spent even more than Droopy-Drawers Clinton was hoping for, "You guys just don't get the big picture, do you?"

Well, guess what, folks---and you can look it up, too: Every last one of those House Republicans then trying to put the brakes on the ramped-up budgets went home and told their constituents just why they were voting against those budgets . . . and every one of them survived in the 1998 elections.

Those budgets more than anything involving the impeachment were the reasons House Republicans lost some seats in those elections. And that ended up being one of the key reasons why Newt Gingrich was a dead duck as Speaker of the House within days of those elections.

And what did the Republican Party learn from that?

Take another look at the 'Aught decade.

They learned nothing. While spending everything they could spend and get away with and, on too many occasions, treating the Constitution as though it came with a sunset clause or an expiration date.

Thus went the Republican Revolution and thus came the Age of Pelosi/Reid/Obama.

(Take another look at the 2006 exit polls. The preponderant answer as to why the Democrats were retaking Congress had to do with spending and with constitutional malfeasance, from which you could conclude reasonably enough that enough people figured that if we're going to live with glandular spending and constitutional malfeasance, we'll be damned if we're gonna take it from the party that props itself up as the party of smaller government and constitutional propriety. Which is probably a fancy way of saying, essentially, "If we want to be done like Democrats, we can't do worse than to let the real thing do us.")

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.