Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ann Coulter to Headline Gay Conservative Fundraiser, 'Homocon 2010'
Associated Content ^ | Aug 7, 2010 | Mark Whittington

Posted on 08/08/2010 7:57:45 PM PDT by DesertRenegade

It seems that the irrepressible Ann Coulter is going to headline a fund raising event by a group called GoProud, a Gay Republican organization. The fund raising

The Left, as one might imagine, might have a hard time putting together the word "gay" and the word "conservative" in the same sentence. But, as the GoProud website suggests, gay people, like black conservatives, can also be in favor of "--limited government, individual liberty, free markets and a confident foreign policy."

GoProud particularly opposes the estate or death tax since gay couples do not enjoy the marriage exemption to the tax as they are not legally allowed to marry in most states. In fact, one GoProud spokesperson called it "the gay tax."

GoProud somewhat eschews traditional gay political issues like same sex marriage and hate crime legislation in favor of tax cuts and rights of gun owners.

Ann Coulter, who once used an anti gay slur to refer to former Presidential candidate former Vice President candidate, and former Senator John Edwards, would seem an odd choice to headline something called "Homocon." But this is another stereotype that the Left likes to impose on people. Surely one cannot be a straight conservative and not hate gay people?

Apparently Ann Coulter can be a right winger and show up to party with gay folks. In fact, when asked about it, she said, "I'm the right-wing Judy Garland!" The late singer and actress most famous for her starring role on "The Wizard of Oz" was well known for her associations with gay people.

(Excerpt) Read more at associatedcontent.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aids; homocon; homosexualagenda; pederasty; sodomy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last
To: antonico

The Americans that created this nation and created the rules were intolerant of what you are trying to push here, homosexuals did not fare well in their hands, they did not call homosexuality liberty. Washington himself would drive them in disgust from his army.

Conservatives support conservative economics, conservatives also support our original conservative and religious culture.

Liberals that just want like the economics of conservatives but want to promote the rest of the left’s agenda, can pound sand.


21 posted on 08/08/2010 9:18:01 PM PDT by ansel12 (Mitt: "I was an independent during the time of Reagan-Bush. I'm not trying to return to Reagan-Bush")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade
See also, the comments on these RELATED threads.
22 posted on 08/08/2010 9:22:49 PM PDT by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade

Except much more masculine.


23 posted on 08/08/2010 9:26:01 PM PDT by InABunkerUnderSF (Anyone who has read Roman history knows a barbarian invasion when they see one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade

Deep down, a lot of elite/big-money conservatives don’t really care for the social conservative issues. I wonder if there’s some of that in play here.


24 posted on 08/08/2010 9:40:29 PM PDT by eater-of-toast ("It is much more important to kill bad bills than to pass good ones." -- Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antonico

America was founded upon freedom of religion:

America as a Religious Refuge:
The Seventeenth Century

Many of the British North American colonies that eventually formed the United States of America were settled in the seventeenth century by men and women, who, in the face of European persecution, refused to compromise passionately held religious convictions and fled Europe. The New England colonies, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Maryland were conceived and established “as plantations of religion.” Some settlers who arrived in these areas came for secular motives—”to catch fish” as one New Englander put it—but the great majority left Europe to worship God in the way they believed to be correct. They enthusiastically supported the efforts of their leaders to create “a city on a hill” or a “holy experiment,” whose success would prove that God’s plan for his churches could be successfully realized in the American wilderness. Even colonies like Virginia, which were planned as commercial ventures, were led by entrepreneurs who considered themselves “militant Protestants” and who worked diligently to promote the prosperity of the church.
http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/religion/rel01.html


25 posted on 08/08/2010 9:52:30 PM PDT by donna (Synonyms: Feminism, Marxism, Communism, Socialism, Fascism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Tammy Bruce rocks - I began listening to her years ago when I loved in LA. Her transformation is remarkable.


26 posted on 08/08/2010 9:56:23 PM PDT by peggybac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GinaLolaB

Wake up, smell coffee.

3 R Senators and one very big time R congressmen are all but openly gay.

A vote is a vote.


27 posted on 08/08/2010 10:13:06 PM PDT by MindBender26 (Party Like It's 1773....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GinaLolaB

Wake up, smell coffee.

3 R Senators and one very big time R congressmen are all but openly gay.

A vote is a vote.


28 posted on 08/08/2010 10:13:11 PM PDT by MindBender26 (Party Like It's 1773....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Well then you should take it up with Ann Coulter. Evidently she can overlook. Shame you can’t. Peace.


29 posted on 08/08/2010 10:28:21 PM PDT by antonico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: donna

The freedom to practice a religion does NOT conflate to the United States being founded AS a religious nation. It’s not the Christian equivalent of the Islamic Iran. Anyone who thinks so doesn’t get it. If the founders intended this to BE a ‘religious” nation they would have enshrined a particular religion as the state religion in the constitution. They expressly prohibited any established religion. It’s today’s religious conservatives who are expressly trying to enshrine their religious beliefs into public policy. Which is exactly what the founders forbade in the constitution.


30 posted on 08/08/2010 10:33:57 PM PDT by antonico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
Tammy Bruce is gay and is an “independent conservative”

She also opposes gay "marriage" and adoption. Does GOProud?

31 posted on 08/08/2010 10:38:39 PM PDT by montag813 (http://www.facebook.com/StandWithArizona)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: antonico
And further, isn't largely a Christian Agenda..which leaves Jews like me sort of left out?

I am also a Jew, and embrace the "Christian agenda". Speak for yourself.

32 posted on 08/08/2010 10:40:37 PM PDT by montag813 (http://www.facebook.com/StandWithArizona)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ansel12; antonico
The Americans that created this nation and created the rules were intolerant of what you are trying to push here, homosexuals did not fare well in their hands, they did not call homosexuality liberty.

antonico is like GOProud, obsessed with his own sexual urges.

33 posted on 08/08/2010 10:42:46 PM PDT by montag813 (http://www.facebook.com/StandWithArizona)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: antonico

Overlook what? I won’t overlook left wing agendas being pushed, without responding to it.

I wouldn’t be here if I supported liberalism.


34 posted on 08/08/2010 10:46:02 PM PDT by ansel12 (Mitt: "I was an independent during the time of Reagan-Bush. I'm not trying to return to Reagan-Bush")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

What liberalism? If you say all gays are nothing more than liberals (they’re not) then is it fair to say all Conservatives are bigots?


35 posted on 08/08/2010 10:54:39 PM PDT by antonico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: antonico
They expressly prohibited any established religion. It’s today’s religious conservatives who are expressly trying to enshrine their religious beliefs into public policy. Which is exactly what the founders forbade in the constitution.

What they wrote merely forbids the federal government from getting involved in the question at all, besides, who is imposing religion on you, this is politics and law.

The founders did not tolerate homosexuality, do you think that they would have spoken to a homosexual political group?

Do you think that any political party in existence then would have allowed a homosexual activist group within it?

36 posted on 08/08/2010 10:56:43 PM PDT by ansel12 (Mitt: "I was an independent during the time of Reagan-Bush. I'm not trying to return to Reagan-Bush")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: antonico

Pushing homosexuality is a part of the leftwing agenda, that means liberalism.

If a homosexual is pushing it, then he is a liberal, regardless of what tax policy he prefers.


37 posted on 08/08/2010 10:58:56 PM PDT by ansel12 (Mitt: "I was an independent during the time of Reagan-Bush. I'm not trying to return to Reagan-Bush")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: antonico

That’s not what I said. You said America was founded upon individual freedom. It was founded upon freedom of religion.


38 posted on 08/08/2010 10:59:49 PM PDT by donna (Synonyms: Feminism, Marxism, Communism, Socialism, Fascism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Then by the same flawed logic it can be said that anyone who looks at al homosexuals as leftists is a bigot. And conflating homosexuality and liberalism is ..well.pretty weak. Mentally and otherwise. And its clear the very subject of homosexuality just really gets under your thin skin, for whatever reason.


39 posted on 08/08/2010 11:17:35 PM PDT by antonico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: antonico

That is a goofy post that is way off topic and nasty for no reason.

Read my posts and quit making up your own for me in their place.

If a someone is pushing homosexuality then they are pushing an element of the radical left, and liberalism.

Do you understand the difference between someone being a homosexual and someone that is promoting the homosexual agenda?

Conservative homosexuals do not promote homosexuality.


40 posted on 08/08/2010 11:23:13 PM PDT by ansel12 (Mitt: "I was an independent during the time of Reagan-Bush. I'm not trying to return to Reagan-Bush")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson