Now you are going off the reservation again. That has not been determined by any competent authority, judicial or otherwise. Assertions do not equal fact and facts do not equal findings in law. You are skipping several steps. I respect your opinions, but you are not entitled to turn them into findings of facts and matters of law.
1. The HDOH has confirmed that Obama’s BC is amended.
2. HRS 338-17 says an amended BC means nothing legally until determined as probative when presented as evidence to a judicial or administrative person or body.
3. Obama has made sure his amended BC has never been presented as evidence.
4. Without any legal determination of Obama’s birth facts nobody can legally say even what age he is, much less where he was born or who his parents were.
5. To “qualify” to be president a person has to meet the age, citizenship, and residency requirements of Article II.
6. Nobody could possibly know whether Obama “qualified” even now, much less Jan 20, 2009.
7. The 20th Amendment says that if the President elect has “failed to qualify” by Jan 20th the Vice President elect is to “act as President”.
8. Only one person can act as President at a time.
9. If the 20th Amendment was followed, Joe Biden alone would be able to “act as President” at this time.
OK. Now let’s do this like a geometric proof. Tell me which of those statements is incorrect. If they are all correct, then the conclusion is correct.