Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: so_real

The HDOH has already indirectly confirmed in 2 different ways that the Factcheck COLB is a forgery.

One of the ways they revealed that was by making a statutory admission that Obama’s genuine BC is amended - a fact that by law has to be noted on any genuine COLB but is not noted on the Factcheck COLB.

That revelation also makes clear that the best Hawaii has for Obama still has no legal value at all until it is determined to be probative by a judicial or administrative person or body when the BC is actually presented to them as evidence.

Until that happens there is zero legal documentation for Obama from Hawaii at all.

The forgery was an attempt to hide the fact that the genuine BC has no legal value.

Obama literally has no legal birth facts. At least not from Hawaii. He has legal birth facts he used before 2006 (when he amended his Hawaii BC) - probably a Kenyan BC. But his claims of a Hawaii birth rely on the Hawaii BC, and those claims have only the legal status of hearsay. Hawaii law specifically states that the probative value of an amended BC cannot be determined without a judicial or administrative person or body being presented the BC as evidence. Obama made sure that could never happen.

The 20th Amendment gives the President elect until Jan 20th to “qualify”. If he fails to do it by then, the Vice President elect is to “act as President” until a President qualifies.

Obama has never qualified. He doesn’t even have any legally-established birth facts.


136 posted on 08/09/2010 9:47:45 AM PDT by butterdezillion (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]


To: butterdezillion

Does this make sense to you, butterdezillion?

I’m having trouble keeping up with all of these details.

***

nc1 says:
Monday, August 9, 2010 at 3:53 AM

In the AP article Okubo offered to sell the index data for year 1961 to anyone willing to pay $98.

She admitted that birth index data contains the year of birth.

It contradicts the earlier response from DoH.

Why did they provide index data without specifying Obama’s year of birth in their original response?

What other part(s) of birth index data have they refused to release to public?

Why do they hide the registration number?

Found at ThePostEmail


138 posted on 08/09/2010 10:11:41 AM PDT by rosettasister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson