Posted on 08/07/2010 8:03:35 PM PDT by RobinMasters
It’s fairly common for schools to make a kid repeat a year if s/he attended a school in another jurisdiction that had a different curriculum. It might (or might not) explain the size difference of the 2 3r grade students.
Bingo!
Its not a public document. And crappy typewriters are a “hallmark” of the underfunded Immigration Service.
“...Another thing I thought of was posting all the available elementary school age photos (up to the 5th grade class photo) together so they can be compared to Inoue Barry.”
see comment by BP2 below
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2416310/posts?page=237#237
Focus, people, focus.
Cheers!
Thanks. I’ll have a good look at them when I have some time.
There is a later memo that indicates that no documentation was presented to back up that claim.
Because a US citizen mother could have a non-citizen child. For example one born outside the US with non citizen father and the mother not having lived in the US for long enough after the age of 14. When BHO was allegedly born SA had not lived the necessary time in the US after her 14th birthday.
At one point it was not just cheap ones, but all of them. Many typists learned to use the lower case "l" and continued after the "1" was available. My mother in law for example. She still types that way. (She was a secretary before she was married).
But out in the field, like in Hawaii, they might have still had the older typewriters, and surely would have had older typists.
So then the State Department must have had a reason to request an inquiry into the citizenship of her son — like evidence that she had travelled abroad to Kenya at or about the time of his birth.
Yes, Joseph and Dr. Corsi, too, have been doing yeoman's work on this issue. But to what practical end? The simple facts are (1) that Barack Hussein Obama has not proven that he was born in the United States because he as not had to. (2)Here's the kicker: If he COULD prove Hawaiian birth, he still quite simply cannot prove that he is a "Natural Born Citizen," because his father was a foreigner.
Barack Hussein Obama may very well be a Native Born Citizen, or a Naturalized Citizen. It is even entirely possible that he was (GASP!) born in Hawaii. But no matter where he was born, or what citizenship(s) he held then, or now holds, he can never be a "Natural Born Citizen." That requires TWO (2) US citizen parents.
The rest is smoke and mirrors; from WND and from Team Obama, not to mention the GOP, which has enthusiastically joined in the charade from the git-go. If anything were ever George Bush's fault, this is it!
WND understandably keeps the story going to get web hits. That's the way they make money. Team Obama keeps the pot boiling to confuse the quite simple story and to keep their base voters charged up.
Despite all of this, BHO, Jr. is the sitting, de facto POTUS, and unless impeached, convicted, and/or resigns, will be until 2012.
WND's far more worthwhile effort is their attempt to develop a Republican Strategy to reverse the Obama Tide of Marxist Social Engineering. Naturally, being hard work and requiring reader thought and analysis, this admirable effort to sell "papers," will be less successful for WND in the cyber world.
Toot certainly was very, VERY silent, hmmm!!!
“96”???
1961
That has never been tested in the courts. If Obama was born in the US, he is a citizen period under existing laws. The issue is whether he is considered natural born under the Constitution. We don't know because the issue would have to go to SCOTUS. Chester Arthur's case is the closest we have ever come to getting it decided. President Arthurs father, William Arthur, became a United States citizen in August 1843. But Chester Arthur was born in 1829. Therefore, he was a British Citizen by descent, and a dual citizen at birth, if not his whole life.
Many at the time suspected Chet (I feel I know the guy, so I use his nickname) to have been ineligible, but no one was able to prove it. Chet further obfuscated the conundrum by burning all his papers before shuffling off the planet.
However, Lawyer Donofrio has finally established what 10 generations of historians could not, that is that old Chet actually was ineligible and definitely NOT a "Natural Born Citizen" and what's worse, the rotten SOB knew it. Papa was definitely a British subject (Irish variety) at the time of Chet's birth. It also seems likely that Chet switched places with a dead younger brother to at least be able to say he was "Native" born, when it is mighty likely he was born in Canada!
Team Obama assiduously investigated the use of Chester A. Arthur as a "precedent" of sorts, but even they, who ordinarily would steal a hot stove, as befits their Chicago political lineage, didn't want to go there!
Of course you are correct when you tell us that the SCOTUS has never directly and narrowly addressed the issue.
ATTENTION--- SCOTUS: "Bout now would be a good time?
OTOH, if we delay a year or two, our de facto POTUS will have time to appoint Raoul Castro, Hugo Chavez, and a utility commie Lesbian (African-American of course) yet to be named, to the august legal body.
My arduous researche in the archives of the State of Hawaii, where a dog license or motorcycle title is far more legally reliable than their so-called birth certificates* have definitely proven to even the most hardened skeptic that our de facto POTUS, Barack Hussein Obama, Jr is:,
*Hey, I am not kidding. It was very common for Asian foreigners of all sorts to register a kid born overseas as a "Home Birth" in Hawaii, so when the kid got off the boat, or later, the plane, at age 11, he would have an American Birth Certificate! That's why for years, Hawaii itself did not accept the COLB as proof of much of anything. Now a dog license ... no fooling around there. You could get rabies!
Sounds like an episode of One Step Beyond I watched last night.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.