Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Incredible Threat
The Daily Reckoning ^ | 8-6-2010 | Bill Bonner

Posted on 08/07/2010 2:12:13 PM PDT by blam

Incredible Threat

By Bill Bonner

08/06/10 Ouzilly, France – Last week, Mr. James Bullard was being both cagey and clairvoyant. The president of the St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank noticed what everyone else has seen for months; the US economic recovery is a flop. GDP growth was last measured pottering along at a 2.4% rate in the second quarter, less than half the speed of the last quarter of ’09. At this stage in the typical post-war recovery, GDP growth should be over 5% with strong employment. Instead, the “Help Wanted” pages are largely empty. Homeowners are still underwater. And shoppers are still largely missing from the malls that once knew them. Whatever is going on, it is not the “V” shaped recovery that economists had expected. Many now worry that the recovery might have a “W” shape – a “double dip recession” form, with GDP growth dropping down below zero in this quarter or the next.

Mr. Bullard told a telephone press conference he worries that the US economy may become “enmeshed in a Japanese-style deflationary outcome within the next several years.” That is exactly what is likely to happen.

But it is a little early for the Fed economists to throw in the towel. They still have some fight left in them. If they were really on the ropes, for example, they could throw their “widow maker” punch – dropping dollar bills from helicopters. This would make sure that the money supply increases, even if the normal distribution channel – bank lending – is broken.

In a celebrated speech on Nov. 21, 202, Mr. Ben Bernanke, then a recent addition to the Federal Reserve Bank’s board of governors, explained why deflation was not a problem:

Like gold, US dollars have value only to the extent that they are strictly limited in supply. But the US government has a technology, called a printing press (or, today, its electronic equivalent), that allows it to produce as many US dollars as it wishes at essentially no cost.

It was that technology to which Mr. Bullard referred when he ceased being prescient and began being cagey. He was not advocating dropping money from helicopters, not just yet. He was hoping he wouldn’t have to. Instead, he was raising the menace of inflation, in the hopes that that would be enough.

“By increasing the number of US dollars in circulation, or even by credibly threatening to do so,” Mr. Bernanke had continued, “the US government can also reduce the value of a US dollar in terms of goods and services, which is equivalent to raising prices in dollars of those goods and services… We conclude that under a paper money system, a determined government can always generate higher spending and hence positive inflation.”

There’s the problem right there. The threat must be credible. Ben Bernanke’s speech title left no doubt about his intentions: “Deflation: Making sure it doesn’t happen here.” Back then, the reported consumer price measure stood at 1.7% – slightly below the 2% target. Perhaps it was that 0.3% undershoot that set Ben Bernanke to thinking about it. If so, we wonder what he must think now. Today, the Fed is off-target by 75%, which is to say, the measured inflation rate is just 0.5%. It is beginning to look as though Ben Bernanke’s reputation as a deflation fighter is more boast than reality.

The Fed’s Open Market Committee meets on August 10th. On the agenda will be more direct purchases of US Treasury debt – bought with money that didn’t exist previously. This is what economists call “quantitative easing.” It is a way of increasing the money supply. But quantitative easing is not the same as dropping money from helicopters.
If you drop money from helicopters there is no room for ambiguity, and no doubt about what happens next. In a matter of seconds, your currency will be sold off, your loans called, and your credibility ruined for at least a generation.
Quantitative easing, on the other hand, is a much more subtle proposition. It allows the central banker to maintain his credibility, at least for a while, because it doesn’t necessarily or immediately work.
When the private sector is hunkering down, the money doesn’t go far. Prices don’t rise. Japan has done plenty of quantitative easing, with no loss to the value of the yen or to the credibility of its central bank. Europe has done it too. And so has America. The US Fed bought $1.25 trillion worth of Wall Street’s castaway credits in the ’08-’09 rescue effort. But instead of losing faith in America’s central bank, investors bend their knees and bow their heads. Incredibly, the US now announces the heaviest borrowing in history while it enjoys some of the lowest interest rates in 55 years.

A threat to undermine the currency, we conclude, is only credible when it is made by someone who has already lost his credibility. That is, someone with nothing more to lose. Bernanke, Bullard, et al, are not there yet.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bernanke; bullard; deflation; inflation

1 posted on 08/07/2010 2:12:18 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam
Economy Heading for a Systemic Collapse into Hyperinflationary Great Depression


2 posted on 08/07/2010 2:13:35 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Cloward and Piven.


3 posted on 08/07/2010 2:17:53 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Question: When you flood the market with money, who is the money given to? Checks for all? Anyone know? Thanks in advance.


4 posted on 08/07/2010 2:27:46 PM PDT by cornfedcowboy (Trust in God, but empty the clip.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cornfedcowboy

Maybe I should run towards any noise that sounds like a helicopter?


5 posted on 08/07/2010 2:36:16 PM PDT by cornfedcowboy (Trust in God, but empty the clip.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cornfedcowboy
Question: When you flood the market with money, who is the money given to? Checks for all? Anyone know? Thanks in advance.

In the last version of this tactic, they mailed checks out to individuals.

My own guess is that the next time that they will do this via direct issue of new money rather than borrowing the funds as they did last time.

While they could theoretically use U.S. Notes for this (or even Federal Reserve Notes (FRNs), though there's no history of FRNs simply being given away by the Fed), it's more likely that they would again use checks.

6 posted on 08/07/2010 2:36:52 PM PDT by snowsislander (In this election year, please ask your candidates if they support repeal of the 1968 GCA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blam

I would say an “L” is more fitting. If we can retake some political power this fall we might see a “Y”.


7 posted on 08/07/2010 2:46:45 PM PDT by red tie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cornfedcowboy

Question: When you flood the market with money, who is the money given to? Checks for all? Anyone know? Thanks in advance.
**************************************************
So far the government has only dealt with “too big to fail” entities ,, even GE may be too small to be helped. You will not be helped , I will not be helped and the banks will hold the currency as they have in the recent past because there is nobody who wants to borrow or has a business plan that shows enough promise in this environment to make lending to them an easy decision. We are screwed. 99% of all of us will be crying out for a sack of UN (read USA) donated rice before this is over.

On a positive note we will all have free houses as we can simply sell one loaf of bread and use the proceeds to pay off the banks (or the banks will just shred the notes as the cost of a stamp for sending a collection letter will exceed the balance..).


8 posted on 08/07/2010 2:58:25 PM PDT by Neidermeyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cornfedcowboy
Maybe I should run towards any noise that sounds like a helicopter?

********************************************

Just stay away from the garbage trucks..


9 posted on 08/07/2010 3:01:54 PM PDT by Neidermeyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Neidermeyer

They’re making it out of people, aren’t they?


10 posted on 08/07/2010 6:40:41 PM PDT by Former Proud Canadian (How do I change my screen name now that we have the most conservative government in the world?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Former Proud Canadian

Like a combine during harvest. The machine needs to be fed.


11 posted on 08/07/2010 6:54:39 PM PDT by cornfedcowboy (Trust in God, but empty the clip.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson