Now THAT is a fantastic argument, grey whiskers. I could see the other side saying that tax exemption is a privilege and if churches weren’t willing to perform marriages, they could lose it.
That could be a very real concern.
In both senses of the word.
The answer is to do counter-offensives.
For "gay rights" the answer is to hold them to the same standards of safety that they apply to consumer goods and any non-big-pharma owned medicines.
"Even one person" dying from Pneumocystis Carinii Pneumonia is too many.
The other way is to present a cultural counterdilemma to the pincer movement on the heterosexual Christian middle class in the United States by the left and the Muslims.
The other way would be to publicly identify the gay activists and gay judges to the militant jihadists allowed into our country.
When the jihadists start confronting the homosexuals -- or committing violence -- we can then roll back the tide of subjugation; and presumably in the ensuing publicity we can then educate the public to what the gay lifestyle *really* entails (Folsom Street Fair, bathhouses, annilingus and worse).
Cheers! Cheers!