Posted on 08/04/2010 5:27:36 PM PDT by Pontiac
Shame on this gay judge for NOT recusing himself from this case!! ON TO THE SUPREMES! >:-(
I wouldn’t have expected any other “decision” from a “gay” judge. Banning homosexual “marriage” is un-gaylike.
Voters just don’t matter to the courts! Especially, this one!
Bush I’s fault
Is there a sexual orientation out there that wouldn’t have to recuse him/her/istself?
Maybe this isn’t something that is a basic right but has as a practical matter to be decided by the public at large for the sake of an orderly society.
End of “Consent of the Governed” ping.
I would.
I expect judges to look at the law, look at precedent and the constitution and then make a ruling based on the law.
If the judge does not think that they can make an impartial judgment then they should recuse themselves.
I dont see that being gay alone would make this judge partial. But perhaps being an activist judge and being gay perhaps she should have recused herself.
Sure they do! But only the ones that agree with them.
Draw up a proposal.
It could be the reality TV hit of next year.
I can see it now......The Bichon Frise is mine, dammit!
Here in WI we banned homosexual marriage and our Supremes upheld it. So is homo marriage legal or not?
Marriage is between two people of the opposite sex.
That’s a definition, and has been for centuries.
I don’t accept their perverse redefinition. Nor will I attend any event where they are welcome. While corporate policy may demand it, they cannot demand my support, and I’ll not offer it.
I’d also prefer to decrease AIDs funding to zero: don’t do the crime if you can’t do the time.
Just think of how they've screwed up your health insurance.
It really about what our moral beliefs are and will be based upon. See http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/2564773/posts and my post also.
Bless the Lord.
NOT
At least not until August 6.
The verdict doesn't mean same-sex couples can now get married in California. Judge Walker stayed new same-sex marriages in the state pending an appeal until at least August 6. Lawyers for the defense have said they plan to appeal.
Just another example of the judiciary controlling the people’s decisions. State’s rights has long been nullified.
Judge voids...on California voters.
OK
But your not getting your mother’s wedding ring back!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.