Skip to comments.
Who says the Sun controls our weather and climate? An interview with astrophysicist Piers Corbyn
Environmental Policy Examiner ^
| August 1, 2010
| Kirtland Griffin
Posted on 08/04/2010 2:38:40 PM PDT by Vincent Jappi
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: Vincent Jappi
Would someone ask him what the weather will be like tomorrow. I was planning to play golf.
2
posted on
08/04/2010 2:41:36 PM PDT
by
donhunt
(Where does this totalitarian ashwipe get off telling me I can't chose for myself?)
To: Vincent Jappi
Stupid....Turn the sun off and see what happens....AAUGH!
3
posted on
08/04/2010 2:42:14 PM PDT
by
devane617
(VOTE THEM OUT! ALL OF THEM!)
To: Vincent Jappi
The only reason Earth has weather/climate is due to heating from the Sun. Take away the solar heat input and we are a lifeless icy rock.
4
posted on
08/04/2010 2:45:29 PM PDT
by
allmost
Comment #5 Removed by Moderator
To: dfwgator
Huh? He says AGW is a fraud and bases his predictions (which people volutarily pay for) based on solar and lunar cycle. Why does that make him a Flat Earther?
6
posted on
08/04/2010 3:03:56 PM PDT
by
piytar
(Those who never learned that peace and freedom are rare will be taught by reality.)
To: Vincent Jappi
thanks for posting this. very interesting. we really do live in amazing times.
To: Vincent Jappi; steelyourfaith
” I then placed bets on my weather forecasts with William Hill bookmakers every month from summer 1988 and made money pretty consistently until 2000 when they terminated my account betting arrangement. “
That’s great!!!!!!
To: dfwgator
read the article and check out his site - weatheraction.com. Corbyn’s view is that the Sun is basically responsible for all changes in weather and he is using his theories to make accurate long range forecasts.
To: vbmoneyspender
Ok, I take it back, I got suckered in by the headline. I will ask the moderator to remove.
10
posted on
08/04/2010 3:12:08 PM PDT
by
dfwgator
To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra; markomalley; Nipfan; rdl6989; Tunehead54; Clive; Little Bill; tubebender; ...
11
posted on
08/04/2010 3:13:01 PM PDT
by
steelyourfaith
("Release the Second Chakra !!!!!!!" ... Al Gore, 10/24/06)
To: dfwgator
I got suckered in by the headline. Happens to the best of us.
To: Vincent Jappi
Kirt: Are you still predicting 100 years of cool weather/Climate? Shortly before his death, Timo Niroma predicted a high likelihood for a 300 year cooling period. How does that work for you? Is that possible or maybe even likely? Piers: YES. 100 year (at least)
If this happens, the rats will slowly jump off the sinking AGW ship.
To: Vincent Jappi
14
posted on
08/04/2010 3:27:29 PM PDT
by
Danae
(If Liberals were only moderately insane, they would be tollerable. Alas, such is not the case.)
To: steelyourfaith
syf,
I just sent this article to all my AGW dweebo friends. I changed a name, or a formula late in the article to include their names, and told them they were mentioned. It’s the only way to get them to read almost the whole thing!
To: SirKit
16
posted on
08/04/2010 3:32:05 PM PDT
by
SuziQ
To: Vincent Jappi
17
posted on
08/04/2010 3:32:40 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(Greenhouse Theory is false. Totally debunked. "GH gases" is a non-sequitur.)
To: Vincent Jappi
Piers: Most of the media are a profiteering part of the unholy Square of self-feeding and self-serving climate fraud / deceit. The Square comprising - see diagram: * Self-serving 'researchers' and 'experts' who produce climate change / Global warming hysteria. * The 'Green' media who propagate this drivel and spread malevolence against those who refuse to produce or support climate change falsities. * Politicians who in the name of saving the planet / Climate change can do what they like in terms of taxation, 'green' projects, controlling world energy supplies, holding back the developing world etc and SHOVELLING MONEY into the 'researchers' who manufacture climate change hysteria. * Businesses and NGOs who gain from the policies of Carbon trading (banks) and high energy prices (energy industry) and any green drivel business. They of course support 'research' to justify the situation, which enables them tomake money. The UN bureaucracy is part of this business. There are some pretty nasty networks which keep this in place but is it a conspiracy? Probably partly, but one need not go over the top on this because you don't need a conspiracy for a newspaper editor to want to print hype or for a politician to respond to hysteria and accept a duty to 'save the planet' through taxation. No mealy mouthed circumlocution from Piers. He gives it them with both barrels.
18
posted on
08/04/2010 4:53:15 PM PDT
by
Timocrat
To: Vincent Jappi
19
posted on
08/04/2010 5:51:30 PM PDT
by
Free Vulcan
(No prisoners, no mercy. 2010 is here...)
To: dfwgator
Ok, I take it back, I got suckered in by the headline. Like many Freepers you are happily posting without reading the article. It does save a lot of time, doesn't it?
Headline writers depend on that. At most newspapers those people are a separate group from the reporters and often the headline is quite different from the article. The headline is usually more liberal.
20
posted on
08/04/2010 6:07:13 PM PDT
by
Mind-numbed Robot
(Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson