Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal judge overturns gay marriage ban in Calif.
ap ^ | Aug 4 | LISA LEFF

Posted on 08/04/2010 2:15:45 PM PDT by JoeProBono

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-188 next last
To: OneWingedShark

That “when” happens when the enforcement mechanism for their will and their protection is no longer in effect.


21 posted on 08/04/2010 2:27:02 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 185JHP; AFA-Michigan; Abathar; Agitate; Albion Wilde; AliVeritas; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.

Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.

Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.

No surprise. I hope by the time this reaches the SCOTUS that 0thugga is out and everyone he appointed and hired and everything he signed has been made null and void.

22 posted on 08/04/2010 2:28:12 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono
Don't ask Don't tell will be revoked.

The gays will use the military to get spousal benefits and housing PLUS health care.

They will then enter civil court and sight military precedent.

It is going to be messy and bloody.

23 posted on 08/04/2010 2:29:03 PM PDT by Kakaze (Exterminate Islamofacism and apologize for nothing....except not doing it sooner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

I am so f-ing mad!! What’s the f-ing point in voting anymore, when some black robed tyrant can overturn an election in one fell swoop.


24 posted on 08/04/2010 2:29:37 PM PDT by Marathoner (Depression=I lost my job, Recession=My neighbor lost his job. Recovery=Obama loses his.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono
Yes, this ruling was predictable. How sad is that?

Citizens of California trying to uphold the sanctity of marriage as God intended are 'overruled' by a homosexual judge, and the leftmedia will cheer.

Young people have been brainwashed in public schools to see homosexual behavior as 'just another lifestyle' and cannot understand why anyone opposes 'gay marriage'. Their usual response to opposition to same-sex 'marrige' is: "who cares?" That is the problem. Fewer and fewer Americans 'care' about refusing to honor a sexual perversion with the sacred title of 'marriage'. The 'gay community's' relentless pursuit of 'marriage' laws that include two people of the same sex is bearing fruit (no pun intended). Our culture is turning into a sewer, and it seems that few really care anymore. If that proves true, we'll get the society we deserve. Sodom and Gomorrah in America? It's getting closer - and it won't be pretty.

25 posted on 08/04/2010 2:32:32 PM PDT by Jim Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marathoner
I am so f-ing mad!! What’s the f-ing point in voting anymore, when some black robed tyrant can overturn an election in one fell swoop.

We live in a Republic, not a democracy.

That means that the rule of law trumps mob rule.

And the rule of law is that you cannot deny people rights even if everyone but the one person impacted voted that way.

You don't have to like it, but it protects you too.
26 posted on 08/04/2010 2:33:50 PM PDT by Filo (Darwin was right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

Welcome to Sodom and Gommorah... and we all know how that went. To see what’s in your future... if this stands....google... Folsom Street Fair.


27 posted on 08/04/2010 2:34:31 PM PDT by BigFinn (isa 32:8 But the liberal deviseth liberal things; and by liberal things shall he stand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

We’re on the way...just like the fall of Rome...

“The principle for which we contend is bound to reassert itself, though it may be at another time and in another form.”

Jefferson Davis


28 posted on 08/04/2010 2:34:58 PM PDT by Lonely Are The Brave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

Such a ruling from a pervert judge shouldn’t surprise anybody.


29 posted on 08/04/2010 2:35:54 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (''I don't regret setting bombs,I feel we didn't do enough.'' ->Bill Ayers,Hussein's mentor,9/11/01)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishCatholic
The wicked freely strut about
When what is vile
Is honored among med

Psalm 12:8

30 posted on 08/04/2010 2:35:58 PM PDT by tbpiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BigGaloot

No, I’m implying that Iraq and Afghanistan are now [they may not have been initially, but that’s another argument] little more than distractions to keep people [citizens] from asserting their rights; after all, “don’t you support the troops?”/”How can you advocate cutting expenses when we’re at war?”/”We’re fighting to spread freedom to these other countries... you obviously don’t want people to be free!”

The same is true of the dismal performance of the media: the reality of what our ‘leaders’ are doing is completely-contrary to the indoctrination of society that those who are in authority are good [and the proof is that they are in positions of authority].

Overall, this “Breakdown of The Rule of Law” can be traced to one thing: the rejection of the “Law of Non-Contradiction.’ This is the axiom in logic that states that a statement cannot be both false and true at the same time. By rejecting this, they reject all logical thought and are free to exercise their power in whatever way they see fit; after all “truth” doesn’t REALLY exist do definitions cannot be firm... meaning that the law, because they can change the definitions at will, is whatever they say it is.

IOW, these distractions are to keep people’s eyes off the very real tyrannies that are going on RIGHT NOW until they can use the excuse “this is how it’s always been” to justify that you “really belong to the freest nation on Earth.”


31 posted on 08/04/2010 2:37:54 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

Evil had truly descended upon our country. As much as I hoped America might hang on until 2012, things like this prove the cancer is terminal. I used the dread the thoughts of another CW, but now it looks like our only salvation.


32 posted on 08/04/2010 2:39:12 PM PDT by greene66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vasilli22

33 posted on 08/04/2010 2:39:30 PM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet - Visualize)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

Liberal judicial activism.


34 posted on 08/04/2010 2:40:12 PM PDT by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Filo
And the rule of law is that you cannot deny people rights

This isn't about "rights", it's about using courts to try and force people to accept something unnatural as being natural.

35 posted on 08/04/2010 2:40:31 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Vasilli22

Is that Jimmah Carter’s twin?


36 posted on 08/04/2010 2:41:25 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Helter Skelter. The Revolution is Upon Us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Considering that CA doesn’t have the funds to pay all it’s employees.... that may be soon.


37 posted on 08/04/2010 2:41:32 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

Would they assign an openly polygamist judge to rule on a polygamy case? What about a proud pedophile judge to preside over a molestation case? It was absurd from the start that they gave the case to an activist queer judge. The fags made a big mistake because this is guaranteed to be overturned.


38 posted on 08/04/2010 2:43:48 PM PDT by DesertRenegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Filo

And what exactly is the “law” that is protected?


39 posted on 08/04/2010 2:43:51 PM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook
The America I grew up in, that brave patriots fought and died for, no longer exists.

I know how you feel. The America we knew is dead. We are just the pallbearers carrying the casket to it's final resting place.

Gay marriage, Open borders, death of the Constitution.

Liberalism's bastard children are squandering the family's inheritance. Another generation like this one and nobody will even know it existed.
40 posted on 08/04/2010 2:44:48 PM PDT by RedMonqey (What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-188 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson