Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: andy58-in-nh

In regard to Øbamacare, HR 3590 is 2074 pages and is extremely difficult to understand but I found some questionable exemptions beginning with page 329.
If certain religious groups, American Indians, illegal immigrants, hardship cases and prison inmates are exempt from ObamaCare’s health insurance mandate then the law is clearly unconstitutional.

How can a federal law dictate adherence by only some groups of people but not others. Why will some religions be required to buy insurance and others will not? How far back does your American Indian heritage have to reach in order to allow exemption? Illegal immigrants won’t have to pay for insurance but hospitals will be required to treat them anyway?

Can legal experts who post here frequently help me to understand why this law should not be thrown out?


24 posted on 08/02/2010 12:50:35 PM PDT by Jonah Vark (Any 5th grader knows that the Constitution declares the separation of powers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: Jonah Vark

That’s what the government, to the left, is all about -

rewarding their “friends” and punishing their enemies.

God states that government is to punish the wicked and reward the righteous.

I guess the left defines the wicked as those that oppose them controlling everything, and the righteous as those who support them.


45 posted on 08/03/2010 6:57:54 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson