Posted on 08/02/2010 11:19:52 AM PDT by Red in Blue PA
WASHINGTON, Aug. 2 (UPI) -- Fifty-seven percent of likely U.S. voters think recently enacted healthcare reform is bad for the country, a Rassmussen Reports poll indicates.
The percentage who think the reform is bad for the country is the highest level of disapproval since the poll began tracking the law following its March passage by Congress.
In contrast, 32 percent say healthcare reform is good for the country.
(Excerpt) Read more at upi.com ...
Now that's just what I was ... wait, what?
And we'll vote for the same assholes in November...
You must be a pretty big person!
I think I’d qualify, but maybe, if, could be...
Most of the dimocrats in that 57% will STILL vote for the present pres_ _ent and dimocrats in the house and senate however.
Who decides if one qualifies?
Maybe the group votes - like Lost.
Or, maybe the audience - like American Idol.
Or, best yet, maybe I choose!
Woooo!
When I’m in charge of hell, Barry Manilow will be played 24/7, The View will be the sole TV show, and the only food available will be boiled okra! BWAHAHAHAHA!
Oprah.
HAHAHAHAHAAAA.
And here is more detail from Rasmussen about this poll:
Health Care Law (59% favor repeal — all time high! , 57% think bad for country — Rasmussen)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2563423/posts
UPI is trying to downplay it: “Most support for repeal comes from Republicans and independents.” — as if that wouldn’t count.
Now with that boiled okra, add a little fish and shrimp, a few spices and voila, gumbo.
What year were women given the “right” to vote?
What year was FDR voted in?
I rest my case your Horror...
True, but in Obama's socialist utopia there's no such thing as scarcity. From each according to his ability, and to each according to his "need."
But... how could this be? Andy Griffith says “good things are coming” with 0bamaCare.
Maybe what you mean is theoretically no scarcity. Nevertheless, this is not true:
1) In theory: The "progressives" really don't care about the "masses." As a Communist sympathizer used to repeat to me over and over again, "The masses are asses." To the true Marxist, the individual counts for nothing. Only the state counts. (Translation: "We are the ones we have been waiting for." And "we" are the "state," the ruling class, the "haves" of society.)
2) In fact: Socialist/Marxist governments remain on the ash heap of history as total and utter failures of societal well being for everyone except the ruling elite who care for nothing other than the perpetuation of their own power. For years, those needing immediate medical attention, who were able, have come to the United States because of SCARCITY of hospitals, hospital beds, and adequate medical services in their own countries with socialized medicine.
bump
Pearly gates.
Highest?
What happened to the 73% who were against it passing?
1920. NATIONALLY. But not state-wise.
1932.
Poor case.
Why?
“The people are waking up.”
I think the idiocy of this law didn’t strike home to some until they saw the Brownback and Brady organizational chart. It makes HillaryCare look lean and efficient!
“Four months after U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi famously declared “We have to pass the bill so you can find out what’s in it,”a congressional panel has released the first chart illustrating the 2,801 page health care law President Obama signed into law in March.
Developed by the Joint Economic Committee minority, led by U.S Senator Sam Brownback of Kansas and Rep. Kevin Brady of Texas, the detailed organization chart displays a bewildering array of new government agencies, regulations and mandates.” More at Congressman Kevin Brady (TX08)…http://www.house.gov/apps/list/press/tx08_brady/pr_100728_hc_chart.html
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.