I didn't propose anything, I made a prediction. Apparently you stupidly think that laws are only overturned in their entirety, but portions of laws are overturned all the time. The judge in AZ only blocked portions of that law, albiet the most important parts.
When the Supreme Court rules in a couple of years we'll see if they overturn all of it, none of it, or portions of it. At that time you'll get either an "I told you so" or an admission that I was wrong in this case.
You post what only you perceive as your "cleverness" at the expense of the cause for freedom. I wouldn't be surprised to learn that you are just another deep cover dissembler.
Take out the clearly unconstitutional "must purchase insurance" aspect out of the law and the thing is effectively emasculated.
If you caught Cuccinelli's interview on Greta last night, on the first win obtained in this fight you may be preparing to make an admission before too much longer. That is, if you even have enough on the ball to even understand the issues when you aren't kissing your dismal wit in the mirror.
The judge in AZ only blocked portions of that law, albiet the most important parts.
And the US Supreme Court will uphold Arizona if for no other reason than the ruling that judge made is fatally internally conflicted.
Like I said, take your prophetic sophistry someplace else.