Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tired_old_conservative; rxsid

<>He meets a commonly understood definition that can be found in legal and scholarly documentation<>

But not in historical traditional legal and scholarly documentation — only recent liberal redefinitions attempted by those who hate the chains of the Constitution.

<> no court has ever ruled that definition does not apply<>

The court of history has already been convened and the Vattel definition cannot be erased or overturned no matter how hard you try, or how much you wish, or how many times you click your ruby red slippers together:

http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/18/4-supreme-court-cases-define-natural-born-citizen/

http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/04/02/founder-and-historian-david-ramsay-defines-natural-born-citizen-in-1789/

http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/04/10/lifelong-democrat-breckinridge-long-natural-born-citizen-means-born-on-the-soil-to-a-father-who-is-a-citizen/

http://theobamafile.com/ObamaNaturalBorn.htm#LeahyResolution

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/04/obama-president-of-us-is-currently-also_07.html

<>Give up the fantasy and let’s win some elections.<>

Ohh — so then the Constitution and American History is a fantasy to you??? You really tired and old.


104 posted on 08/02/2010 2:41:48 PM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]


To: Uncle Chip
“But not in historical traditional legal and scholarly documentation — only recent liberal redefinitions attempted by those who hate the chains of the Constitution.”

It was historical, legal and scholarly enough to actually be cited in the most recent court case to discuss the subject. It was historical, legal and scholarly enough for that court to note that it would deem Obama a natural born citizen. That means a lot more than the cut-and-paste hack work you repeatedly brandish in the hope that someone who matters will care, which they never will. For obvious reasons.

“The court of history has already been convened and the Vattel definition cannot be erased or overturned no matter how hard you try, or how much you wish, or how many times you click your ruby red slippers together:”

There is no court of history, although you might have a salable idea for a new History channel show. That's just a fanciful phrase flung around by people who don't have an actual court in their corner. And no one is trying to erase Vattel from existence. He simply isn't a governing legal authority. You're the one clicking your ruby red slippers together to no avail.

“Ohh — so then the Constitution and American History is a fantasy to you??? You really tired and old.”

Nope. Let me know when you're self-righteous delusions about the Constitution and law bear fruit.

111 posted on 08/02/2010 3:25:19 PM PDT by tired_old_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson