It was historical, legal and scholarly enough to actually be cited in the most recent court case to discuss the subject. It was historical, legal and scholarly enough for that court to note that it would deem Obama a natural born citizen. That means a lot more than the cut-and-paste hack work you repeatedly brandish in the hope that someone who matters will care, which they never will. For obvious reasons.
“The court of history has already been convened and the Vattel definition cannot be erased or overturned no matter how hard you try, or how much you wish, or how many times you click your ruby red slippers together:”
There is no court of history, although you might have a salable idea for a new History channel show. That's just a fanciful phrase flung around by people who don't have an actual court in their corner. And no one is trying to erase Vattel from existence. He simply isn't a governing legal authority. You're the one clicking your ruby red slippers together to no avail.
“Ohh — so then the Constitution and American History is a fantasy to you??? You really tired and old.”
Nope. Let me know when you're self-righteous delusions about the Constitution and law bear fruit.
<>It was historical, legal and scholarly enough to actually be cited in the most recent court case to discuss the subject.<>
Are you referring to this abomination by the famous Footnote 14 Indiana Court???
http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/11/13/indiana-appellate-court-reinvents-nbc-definition/
<>It was historical, legal and scholarly enough for that court to note that it would deem Obama a natural born citizen.<>
Are you referring to the prefabricated doublespeak like this Footnote 14 in their ruling:
“14 We note the fact that the Court in Wong Kim Ark did not actually pronounce the plaintiff a “natural born Citizen” using the Constitution’s Article II language is immaterial”.
Is this court of clowns your authority????
You’ve got nothing — nothing — and you know it — and your court of clowns admitted it with their Footnote 14.
The court of history has already met and the definition used by our historians, founders and Supreme Court justices cannot be overturned by any court, much those court jesters you think so highly of.
You have just demonstrated that you’re on the wrong forum and should change your name to “tired old liberal”.