Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt
The 1st paragraph is a grant of judicial power, in the aggregate. The 2nd paragraph carves that judicial power into original jurisdiction (which means to try the case), and appellate jurisdiction.

Then that interpretation would mean that ANY case involving a state would go straight to the Supreme Court. Then why are there so few (according to Congressman Billybob). Seems like the SC would be overwhelmed with cases if all cases involving a state go straight to the SC.
42 posted on 07/31/2010 1:45:15 PM PDT by AaronInCarolina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: AaronInCarolina; Mr Rogers
-- Then that interpretation would mean that ANY case involving a state would go straight to the Supreme Court. Then why are there so few ... --

There are few because SCOTUS and Congress colluded to provide joint original jurisdiction, between SCOTUS and lower courts. SCOTUS has the option to take original jurisdiction in any case in which a state is a party (but see limited subject matter jurisdiction in the 1st paragraph).

Hat tip to Mr Rogers, see http://law.onecle.com/constitution/article-3/32-original-jurisdiction.html

43 posted on 07/31/2010 1:57:33 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson