Posted on 07/30/2010 1:53:49 PM PDT by jazusamo
Despite predictions he would be swiftly abandoned by his colleagues, House Democrats are shrugging off Rep. Charles Rangel’s ethical scandal as they head for the exits for a six-week summer break.
At least for now.
Most Democrats are suggesting that they’ll let Rangel go through his upcoming ethics trial, taking a wait-and-see attitude as the ethics procedures unfold.
There seem to be three key reasons Rangel is surviving the initial ambush of bad publicity without a true drive to oust him from Congress.
First, Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and other party leaders advising Democrats to stay calm – lawmakers say the dearth of calls for Rangel’s head reflects a mix of respect for both him personally and the institution. They see a veteran member of Congress, a war hero who has served the nation and Harlem in Washington, and don’t want to “jump on his bones,” as one Democrat put it.
“The process will work,” Pelosi said. “It’s bipartisan; the chips will have to fall where they may politically, but upholding the highest ethical standard is the highest priority for us.”
Second, Democrats believe the Rangel scandal isn't really hurting them all that badly back in their home districts. Some House Democrats think the media is overplaying the possible national implications of the case.
"I am not aware of anyone who is going to lose their election over this," said one senior Democrat. "Until it becomes a problem for other members, they will stick with Charlie."
And finally, in spite of the sordid nature of some of the Rangel allegations, the "Statement of Alleged Violations" released by a four-member investigative subcommittee on Thursday, didn't contain any new blockbusters. Members have been hearing about Rangel's ethics problems for two years, so the actual list of ethics charges had less impact because there were no surprises.
"This is a sad, individual tragedy," said one junior Democrat in a swing district. "But despite what the media is saying, this is not playing nationally, and there's no sign it will."
Only four Democrats – all from very vulnerable districts – have called for Rangel to resign. Heading into the first weekend of August recess, there doesn’t appear to be a cascade of fresh resignation calls coming.
Still, the ethics charges are sweeping. A special four-member investigative panel alleged on Thursday that Rangel had solicited millions of dollars in donations from corporations and charities for a New York City college building named after him, failed to disclose more than $600,000 in income and assets from his annual financial disclosure reports, improperly controlled four rent-stabilized units in a luxury Harlem apartment building, and did not pay income taxes on a resort home in the Dominican Republic.
Rangel has continued to insist that he has not violated House rules. "As long as alleged, what the hell, they can have an imagination," Rangel dismissively said the of the ethics committee this week.
Now, instead of pushing Rangel out, House Democrats are putting faith in that ethics process. Rangel faces a September trial by an eight-member panel in September. That panel has the power to dismiss any of the allegations against him.
Even some of the most conservative – and endangered – Democrats aren’t calling for Rangel’s head.
“We as the most powerful government body in the nation would take the time to let the procedure that we have in place make an effort to work. And it is working,” said Alabama Democrat Bobby Bright, whose district is overwhelmingly Republican.
Bright is getting hammered over Rangel in his southeastern Alabama district. The state’s Republican Party issued a news release entitled “Bright Silent on Rangel Amid Growing Calls for his resignation.”
But Bright, the former mayor of Birmingham, who was one of the first to call on Rangel to give up his Ways and Means chairmanship, said Rangel should be given “the opportunity to respond to the allegations.” If Rangel’s found guilty, Bright said he would be “as adamant as anyone to have him punished.”
“I’m not a cheerleader for anybody, I’m up here representing my district in the best way I possibly can,” Bright said. “But I do see a process that is being executed and after it’s completed we can all have our opinions one way or another, whether he’s guilty or not. I would hope there would be someone on the other side if I had similar charges, would give me the same professional courtesy."
Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger (D-Md.) said the ethical mishaps would leave a “small percentage of taint” on his party, but doesn't present a major political problem at this point.
Ruppersberger said he wasn't aware of any evidence that Rangel intentionally broke any laws, and chalked up some of the allegations up to “sloppy recordkeeping."
“There’s nothing wrong with getting money for non-profits in your district,” Ruppersberger said, referring to the Charles B. Rangel Center for Public Policy at City College in New York. “He’s not benefitting from that. Just because it’s named after him? That’s part of what we do, we represent our constituency.”
“Charlie Rangel is not reflecting a culture of anything,” added Rep. Henry Waxman, a California Democrat who has served with Rangel in Congress since 1975. “He’s being charged with personal errors that may amount and may not amount to violations of the ethics rules, that has not been determined.”
There have been some Democratic calls for Rangel’s resignation. Democratic Reps. Betty Sutton (Ohio) and Patrick Murphy (Pa.) have called for him to resign, while Reps. Walt Minnick (D-Idaho) and Ann Kirkpatrick (D-Ariz.) have said if the allegations prove true, Rangel should leave Congress.
Dozens of Democrats have also given up more than $540,000 in campaign donations funneled to them by Rangel, once one of the Democrats' biggest fundraising draws.
Pelosi talking about upholding the highest ethical standard is laughable.
According to The Hill Rep. Mary Jo Kilroy (D-Ohio) is the 5th Dem to call for his resignation.
Rangel is surviving because the racis....er, black caucus has warned the democrats that there will be hell to pay if he doesn’t survive.
I know a couple of repubs ar emaking noise about this, but where is the loud and unified stand? Doe sit not exist because they are all as guilty as Wrangle and just haven’t been ratted out yet?
This article is full of nothing but Democrats making excuses for a Democrat.
Did 9% Nancy ever get a gov’t plane with a big enough carbon footprint for her and her extended family?
Wrangell’s been there so long, he’s probably got dirt on EVERYONE...on both sides of the aisle.....we’ll see if any in the GOP use this for fall election campaigning...
Yep, I’d bet the CBC is not whispering in Pelosi’s ear, they’re screaming in it.
>>>Why Charles Rangel is surviving
He’s not a middle-aged WASP Republican, that’s why. If he were, his sorry arse would have been drummed out of congress long ago by the so-called non-partisan media.
In Japan, when they get caught, they at least have the decency to commit seppaku.
It probably didn’t help that Bill Kristol on Fox News at 6pm yesterday said Rangel’s transgressions were no big deal. Can you believe that?
The Wrangler has them buffaloed.
Kilroy is in a very tight race in Columbus Ohio and has to tack to the right or lose going away. If someone pressured “blue dogs” they would probably call for his resignation also
Exactly, Charlie and the RATS are innocent, dontcha know?
Evil is as evil does...
Duke Cunningham was unavailable for comment.
-PJ
Not surprisingly, Politico tries to chalk this (by this, I mean his survival) to inside baseball. When the fact of the matter its the under reporting, and lack of media outrage in the little reporting that there has been. Had this been a Republican, you could bet the retirement Rangel would be public enemy number one. I actually watched "The View" everyday this week to see if it would have come up. It didn't, which shouldn't surprise anyone.
Are they so insane and politically tone deaf that they will let Rangel skate with a wrist slap ?
Seems so..
That’s what I think — the Black Caucus. They have Obama by the ... chin. Anyway, let’s be culturally diverse. The Muslims cut heads off, kill and mutilate women, etc. It is THEIR way; what right do we have to comment? Same with black scallawags. It is just how they do it, doncha know?
This won’t hardly impact the midterms. It is all about the media machine favoring the Democrats. As Jom Geraghty mentioned today:
“In November 2006, 50% of voters said the economy was “not good” or “poor.” Unemployment rate? 4.5%. GDP grew 3.4% that year.”
The media created the impression that things were bad when they were very very good. Fortunately things are so bad now the media can’t totally cover for the Democrats. Things like Rangel and other ridiculous events won’t really have much additional sway because 60% of the country will never see them.
He’s surviving because he has an impenetrable melanin-based ethics shield.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.