Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DJ MacWoW

Words do have meaning. In this case both ‘edit’ and ‘excerpt’ mean to ‘select’ or ‘cut out’ sections of the original material. And the 1913 definitions do have meaning, and do apply just as well to audio-visual material as they do to written matter.

It’s interesting. You run around like a Robo-chicken sqawking “Words have meaning!” “Words have meaning!” “Words have meaning!” brrraawkk “Words have meaning!” “Words have meaning!” brraawkk

But then you DENY that the meaning in a dictionary that is 97 years old no longer means what it says.

That’s called what? Maybe you know the word to describe it. Cognitive dissonance? Schizophrenia? ADD?


45 posted on 07/30/2010 6:14:35 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: bvw
But then you DENY that the meaning in a dictionary that is 97 years old no longer means what it says

It's called outdated. Modern definitions apply when one is talking about modern society and their understanding. Especially with all the "special" edits that make the rounds in email and on You Tube. You can make anyone say anything with editing now. Excerpted and edited means something entirely different in 2010 than it meant in 1913.

Again, by using the word "edit" the press is trying to smear Breitbart by saying he altered the tape to make it appear that she said something that she didn't. I'm sorry that you don't get it.

47 posted on 07/30/2010 6:21:15 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: bvw
To the general public edit means "to change"

Excerpt means "to take an unaltered selection out of"

Using the word "edit" to describe an unaltered excerpt is playing the leftists game. We must control the terms used in order to win the fight.

51 posted on 07/30/2010 6:29:39 AM PDT by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: bvw

Quit hijacking the thread. What Breitbart did was excerpt a section of the entire video. Actually, whoever emailed him the video did the job. He just posted what he had been given.

In the big picture, your derailing the thread over semantics is taking the focus off of this marxist, racist, money grubbing fame whore.

The real nugget of information is that her husband was given a FCC license so that now they can communicate to their people, hence the reason she came out attacking Fox News.

http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/obama-fcc-czar-mark-lloyd-wants-to-shut-down-dissenting-media/blog-150277/


57 posted on 07/30/2010 6:58:50 AM PDT by CajunConservative (0bama, your ass is the first one you need to kick.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: bvw

I agree that words have meaning. But in the area of film and video, the word “edit’ has come to mean something else.

And I would say that even for literature, there is a difference between an exerpt of a book (like when Truman Capote published a chapter of “Answered Prayers” in Esquire Magazine and when a piece is taken and sections of it are taken out and then put back together with later sections.


66 posted on 07/30/2010 7:19:52 AM PDT by kabumpo (Kabumpo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson