Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: r9etb

” That’s essentially the same position that Arizona is taking: if Congress won’t deal with the issue, we will.”

No, it isn’t. A State has the Constitutional sovereign right to do what they did. An individual does not.

“Why’s it great when AZ does it, but not great when the Executive Branch does it? “

Because it’s UNCONSTITUTIONAL for the ‘Executive’ to do it!


41 posted on 07/29/2010 4:24:53 PM PDT by AuntB (Illegal immigration is simply more "share the wealth" socialism and a CRIME not a race!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: AuntB
No, it isn’t. A State has the Constitutional sovereign right to do what they did.

No, they don't. The Supremacy Clause of the Constitution (Article VI, clause 2) deals directly with that issue.

An individual does not.

It's not "an individual." An executive order is supposed to be a statement of how the Executive Branch of the Federal Government will undertake its Constitutional duty faithfully to execute the laws.

This is almost certainly an unconstitutional move; but the claim that it's an "individual" action is simply false.

48 posted on 07/29/2010 4:46:48 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson