Posted on 07/29/2010 12:29:32 PM PDT by fathers1
Sounds fair. NOT.
Looks like the law was made to please the biggest supporters of the dems - militant man-hating feminazis. That explains it all. Men have no rights under leftist fascism. Men are only good for their money.
The facts don’t matter only the law and we can all feel better with the words of Alcee Hastings where that is concerned:
“There ain’t no rules here, we’re trying to accomplish something. . . .All this talk about rules. . . .When the deal goes down . . . we make ‘em up as we go along.”
—Democratic Rep. Alcee Hastings (Fla.)
“It’s worth asking why the State of Michigan has expended such effort in trying to bankrupt a man it knows has no responsibility for Hoose’s son.”
As you probably know, there’s nothing more dangerous or arrogant than a lazy prosecutor or state’s attorney. “We don’t have to, you lose, pay up or we’ll take everything you own.” The most forceful argument I can think of against mandatory presumptions.
Colonel, USAFR, Esq.
You know, they used to have these things called press gangs...
Men are routinely screwed over in paternity suits. Nothing new.
But you need to come up with better examples than these two losers for anyone to care.
Anytime a man can’t keep his pants zipped up, he invites this kind of trouble.
Compound this with a "mother" claiming a guy is a father and a case is brought into family court. If the guy cannot be reached to appear (say he lives in a different state); be default, he becomes the legal father. No DNA needed.
"Family" court is a God awful abomination. I escaped it somewhat lighter in the pockets; but with most of my liberty intact.
Doesn’t even require un-zipping these days.
Had a friend this happened to. Dated a girl for about a year, broke up and never heard from her again. That is until about 5 years later when he got a letter from her lawyer demanding child support.
He wanted to make sure it was his so he did the DNA test and sure enough it was his. So...he decided to do little checking on this ex girlfriend and lo and behold he dug up some nasty stuff about her and used it against her in court.
He wound up taking FULL custody of the little girl and almost had her sent to jail for numerous charges.
So ladies, if you think you will ALWAYS win this kind of case, beware, you may not like the outcome.
Just sayin...
Is there any possibility that he could sue the woman who LIED to the state and now has inflicted him with sever emotional and financial strain?
I never got in much trouble (6 figure touble) with my pants zipped up.
This piker got off easy with just the massive injustice and 5 figure trouble.
Yet another reason to remain single, CELIBATE, and sane.
It only took 3 trips to the cleaners to figure that out.
/johnny
That is true, but staying zipped stops a lot of it.
/johnny
MI is messed up and completely lazy in any friend of the court situation unless its a huge payoff.
..or slander, libel, defamation of character. He should throw the kitchen sink at her, and use whatever judgment he gets to seize any assets she has.
In a lot of places a woman can name a man on the BC as the father with whom she has never had sex and the guy won’t know until the state comes after him; usually after the time for him to rebut the BC that he doesn’t know about in the first place. You could keep it zipped and still get screwed, so to speak.
***Anytime a man can’t keep his pants zipped up, he invites this kind of trouble.***
AMEN!
“Men are routinely screwed over in paternity suits. Nothing new.
But you need to come up with better examples than these two losers for anyone to care.
Anytime a man can’t keep his pants zipped up, he invites this kind of trouble.”
And you have never made a mistake in your entire life?
Even if “They should have kept their pants zipped up” this is completely wrong. These men are getting screwed by the state and these lying skanks.
These men need to seek justice OUTSIDE the legal system, since none exists within it. The evildoers can be harmed as well... financially and/or physically.
It’s relatively easy to do if you have the stomach for it...
I vaguely remember a case in So Cal where a man paid child support for years but after paying it all those years found out he wasn’t the kids dad after all.
I believe he quit making the payments and the DA came after him even tho he could prove it wasn’t his responsibility. DA didn’t care. He was already “on the hook” and had been for years. DA wasn’t the least bit interested in getting this guy’s money back for him either.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.