The ranges shown on the graphs are very, very small. A few selective data choices could easily make it look however you wanted.
It is laughable, they made obvious choices to maximize the impact why setting up the straw argument of Global Warming vs AGW which are two different things.
The data that those graps are based have been "adjusted" and just by coincidence the adjustments make the past cooler than the raw data, and the present hotter.
I had a great high school teacher in the 60s that had us all read a book entitled “How to Lie with Statistics.”
It taught me lessons I have never forgotten.
The answer to all of this is “follow the effort to tax.”
Thieves want to steal. They steal compulsively. these people are thieves and control freaks.
Yeah. With a little maneuvering, they could make it look something like.....um...a hockey stick?
Just the movement of one point can make a huge difference (example: Chicago’s official recording from Midway Airport in 1960 to O’Hare, makes a big difference ——any Chicagoan can tell you summertime readings at O’Hare are usually about 5 degrees warmer than Midway).
The doofuses with the drug-addled brains think everyone has forgotten the "Little Ice Age! (1300-1870)"
And if they leave it out of their graphs nobody will bring it up.
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!
Today's kindergtarten lesson :
Weather = scores of years
Climate = hundreds of years. Even 5-yr-olds can understand it.